Psychopathia sexualis: With especial reference to contrary sexual instinct: A medico-legal studyKrafft-Ebing, R. von (Richard)
Science
Psychopathia sexualis: With especial reference to contrary sexual instinct: A medico-legal study
Krafft-Ebing, R. von (Richard)
Paraphilias
Rousseau, with reference to whose life and malady Möbius (“J. J.
Rousseau’s Krankengeschichte,” Leipzig, 1889) and Chatelain (“La folie
de J. J. Rousseau,” Neuchatel, 1890) may be consulted, tells, in his
“Confessions” (part i, book i), how Miss Lambercier, aged thirty,
greatly impressed him when he was eight years old and lived with her
brother as his pupil. Her solicitude, when he could not immediately
answer a question, and her threats to punish him if he did not learn
well, made the deepest impression on him. When, one day, he had blows
at her hands, with the feeling of pain and shame, he also experienced
sensual pleasure that incited a great desire to be whipped by her
again. It was only for fear of disturbing the lady, that Rousseau
failed to make other opportunities to experience this lustful, sensual
feeling. One day, however, he unintentionally gave cause for a
whipping at Miss Lambercier’s hands. This was the last; for Miss
Lambercier must have noticed something of the peculiar effect of the
punishment; and from this time on she did not allow the eight-year-old
boy to sleep in her room. From this time Rousseau felt a desire to
have himself punished by ladies pleasing to him, a la Lambercier; but
he asserts that until his youth he knew nothing of the relation of the
sexes to each other. As is known, Rousseau was first introduced to the
real mysteries of love in his thirtieth year, and lost his innocence
through Madame de Warrens. Until that time he had had only feelings
and impulses attracting him to woman, in the nature of passive
flagellation and other masochistic ideas.
Rousseau describes, _in extenso_, how he suffered, with his great sexual
desires, by reason of his peculiar sensuality, which had undoubtedly
been awakened by his whippings; for he reveled in desire, and could not
disclose his longings. It would be erroneous, however, to suppose that
Rousseau was concerned merely with flagellation. Flagellation only
awakened ideas of a masochistic nature. At least, in these ideas lies
the psychological nucleus of his interesting study of self. The
essential element with Rousseau was the feeling of subjection to the
woman. This is clearly shown by the “Confessions,” in which he expressly
emphasizes that “_Etre aux genoux d’une maitresse impérieuse, obéir à
ses ordres, avoir des pardons à lui demander,—etaient pour moi de très
douces jouissances._”[65]
This passage proves that the consciousness of subjection and humiliation
before the woman was the most important element.
To be sure, Rousseau was himself in error in supposing that this impulse
to be humiliated before a woman had arisen by association of ideas from
the idea of flagellation:—
“N’osant jamais déclarer mon goût, je l’amusais du moins par des
rapports qui m’en conservaient l’idée.”[66]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account