Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 1 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-40, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863Miles, Henry Downes
History
Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 1 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-40, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863
Miles, Henry Downes
Boxing
8.—Firby rallied, made a hit, which Belcher
stopped with great adroitness, and immediately
struck Firby over the mouth, cutting his lip
severely; Firby, however, returned it by a sharp
hit, but did not draw blood. (Odds in this round
sunk from ten to five to one.)
9.—At the first onset Belcher put in a severe
blow over his antagonist’s right eye, and
immediately resuming a defensive attitude, very
cheerfully said, “How do you like that, Johnny?”
Firby made a desperate blow, but over-reached
himself, and fell; Belcher smiled, and while he
was down pointed at him with great irony.
11.—Belcher followed his opponent round the
ring, and put in some severe blows, which Firby
stopped, but not effectually; Belcher at length
gave him a knock-down blow, when his friends
insisted he should give in.
The contest lasted twenty minutes, during which
time Firby never had any chance of success. He
had ever been considered a first-rate pugilist,
and consequently the amateurs expected one of
the best displays of science that ever had been
witnessed; but whether Belcher’s name overawed
him, or he really had fallen off in his style of
fighting, he in this contest fell much short of
what was anticipated. Belcher after the battle
had not the mark of a blow perceivable.
Thursday, May 12, 1803.—“Mr. Garrow this day moved for the judgment of
the Court on four defendants, James Belcher, Joseph (but in the
indictment erroneously called Edmund) Burke, Joe Ward, called also
erroneously James, and Henry Lee, who were described to be labourers.
These defendants had allowed judgment to go by default.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account