Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 2 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-1740, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863Miles, Henry Downes
History
Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 2 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-1740, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863
Miles, Henry Downes
Boxing
Notwithstanding this denial, it is certain that a well-intentioned
Quaker lady did act as above described, for which, viewing the peculiar
tenets of her sect, we must rather applaud than ridicule her.
In disposition, Bill Neat was not only generous and cheerful, but might
be termed a “high fellow,” and always ready to serve a friend. He was
fond of a “bit of life,” threw off a good chant, and was the President
of the Daffy Club, held at Sam Porch’s, Guildhall Tavern, Broad Street,
Bristol. It was said of him that, “If he is not a good fighter, Neat is
a good fellow.”
From this period Neat, the small bone of whose arm was really fractured,
retired from the fistic arena. He became subsequently a butcher in
Bristol, where he resided until his death, which took place on the 23rd
of March, 1858, in the sixty-seventh year of his age. Neat was respected
for many social qualities, and his genuine kind-heartedness, under a
rough exterior, gained the friendship of many. His prowess in levelling
the small Welsh cattle by a blow with a gauntlet glove between the eyes
has been narrated to us by eye-witnesses of this Milonian feat. Bill
Neat adds another to the many instances, which this history has
presented, of the esteem and good opinion which the best men of the ring
have earned from all classes of society.
[Illustration]
CHAPTER VI.
THOMAS HICKMAN (“THE GAS MAN”).
A second Hotspur, had the sword been his weapon—fiery, hardy, daring,
impetuous, laughing to scorn all fear, and refusing to calculate odds in
weight, length, or strength, “the Gas Man,” for a brief period, shone
rather as a dazzling comet than a fixed star or planet in the pugilistic
sphere. Impetuous in the assault almost to ferocity, though not
destitute of skill, Hickman, like Hooper in his earlier day, prided
himself that his irresistible charge must confound, dismay, and paralyze
the defence of his opponent. There was certainly something terrific in
his attack, for in his earlier battles his head and body seemed
insensible to blows, at least they failed to drive him from his purpose
or to sensibly affect his strength, cheerfulness, or vigour. At one
period it was thought by his over-sanguine admirers that no skill could
repel his clever “draw” and his rushing onslaught. Retreat, when once in
for a rally, was with him a thing not to be thought of, and he carried
all before him. Success is the test and only criterion of the many, and
Hickman, despite experience, was over-rated. Out of the ring, Hickman
was fond of fun, vivacious, warm-hearted, and friendly; but, as may be
supposed, headstrong, violent, and repentant where wrong. Pugilists,
more liable to insults than most men, should always control their
tempers. It is necessary in the fight, and equally valuable in private
life. Our most eminent boxers (see lives of JOHNSON, CRIBB, SPRING,
etc., for corroboration) have been kind, forbearing, and of equable
temper.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account