Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 2 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-1740, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863Miles, Henry Downes
History
Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 2 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-1740, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863
Miles, Henry Downes
Boxing
At length his career of boasting received an unexpected check. Cribb
argued that his “boy,” Tom Spring (although beaten by Ned Painter in
August, 1818), was good enough to lower the pretensions of “the
Lancashire hero.” Carter’s friends made the match for £50 a-side, and a
purse of £50 for the winner was added by the Pugilistic Club. Two to one
was offered by the north countrymen. The battle was fought on Crawley
Downs, May 4, 1819. The result will be found in the Life of SPRING,
where the report does scant justice to the latter. The infatuation of
Carter’s admirers found expression in the following letters addressed to
_Bell’s Weekly Dispatch_:—
“_Carlisle, May 12, 1819._
“SIR,—
“You will oblige the Cumberland fancy by giving insertion to the
following paragraph in your next paper.
“Your obedient servant,
“H. P.
“The gentlemen of the Cumberland fancy have held a meeting after
reading an account of the battle between Spring and Carter contained
in your paper, and from other sources of information, and were
unanimously of opinion that Carter made a cross of the battle. They
have, therefore, come to the resolution of withdrawing all support
from him in future: they will not back him, even if he were matched
to fight an orange boy. All bets upon the battle have been declared
void in the North.”
This nonsense elicited the following reply:—
“SIR,—
“In reply to a letter, signed H. P., from the Cumberland fancy,
which appeared in your journal of May 16, I shall briefly observe
that the gentlemen who acted as umpires at the battle between Carter
and Spring are well known as men of honour and integrity, and had
they detected anything like a cross, would have immediately made
such a circumstance public. The battle-money was paid without
hesitation. The noble lord who backed Carter also discharged his
bets upon demand; and no refusal has been made in the sporting world
to pay, that has come within the writer’s knowledge.
“Respecting the fight, sir, it was most certainly a bad one—a
pully-hauly encounter; in fact, it was nearly the same as the battle
between Carter and Oliver, at Carlisle, but with this difference—the
left hand of Carter was foiled, and Spring also proved the stronger
man at the ropes. The Lancashire hero having thus lost the two only
points for which he was distinguished, led to his defeat. Spring
behaved like a man, and did not appear to have any hugging
pretensions about him, had he not been dragged to the ropes. Carter
was beaten against his will.
“In giving insertion to the above letter, to prevent any improper
allusions going abroad, you will much oblige
“AN OLD SPORTSMAN.
“_Tattersall’s, Hyde Park Corner, May 28, 1819._”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account