Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 2 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-1740, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863Miles, Henry Downes
History
Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 2 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-1740, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863
Miles, Henry Downes
Boxing
Albeit this period does not mark any change in the “school,” or style,
nor in the rules which govern the practice of public boxing, there are
reasons to be found for a division, in the more copious, accurate, and
systematic reports of the prize-fights of this and the following
periods, due greatly to the exertions and ability of the late Vincent
George Dowling, Esq., of the _Morning Chronicle_, the editor, founder,
and establisher of _Bell’s Life in London_, for many years afterwards
“the Oracle of the Ring,” a title and function now well-nigh abdicated.
About this time, too, other able pens lent their aid. George Daniels,
Esq. (the D—— G——, whose criticisms on the drama lent large value to the
series known as “Cumberland’s Plays,” and who was for a time editor of
the _Weekly Dispatch_), was among the number. That journal also had the
services of George Kent (an enthusiastic milling reporter, whose son and
grandson yet wield the _stylus_ of manifold writers for the daily and
weekly press),[35] and of Mr. Smith, during the period of his
editorship. “Paling its ineffectual fire” before the rising glories of
_Bell’s Life_, and having lost its best writers, a late Old Bailey
attorney and alderman, finding the _Dispatch_ had lost caste with the
sporting community, turned his coat, and betook himself with the zeal
and virulence of a renegade to revile and slander the sports by which
his journal had grown and prospered. But this is by the way. From the
period we have mentioned the chronicles of pugilism have been more
accurate and minute, and therefore more worthy of preservation; hence
the greater bulk and volume of this portion of our history.
On the retirement of Spring, which that boxer announced shortly after
his second battle with Langan, the public attention was occupied with
discussing the worthiest candidate for the vacated belt. In the first
instance Langan was spoken of as the “coming man;” but though there was
some correspondence, as already noticed, with Tom Shelton and Ward, the
Irish champion suddenly retired without making a match, and went into
business at Liverpool. The champion was now to be looked for elsewhere.
Three men had at this time their respective admirers and partisans—Tom
Cannon (the great gun of Windsor), Josh. Hudson (the John Bull fighter),
and Jem Ward (the Black Diamond). The friends of Josh. urged his claim,
on the ground that he had defeated Ward on the 11th of December, 1823;
but then a fortnight after the second fight of Spring and Langan (on
June 23rd, 1824), Tom Cannon had beaten Hudson in twenty minutes and
seventeen rounds, and again (see Memoir of CANNON) in the November
following, in sixteen rounds, twenty minutes. This led to Cannon’s
challenging Ward for the championship, the details and results of which
we shall notice in due course. We now return to the biography of Ward.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account