Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 2 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-1740, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863Miles, Henry Downes
History
Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 2 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-1740, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863
Miles, Henry Downes
Boxing
On Tuesday, the 6th of January, 1827, Ward took a benefit at the Tennis
Court, which was crowded by his patrons, who then bore testimony to
their approbation of his manly conduct in his fight with Peter Crawley.
Ward was anxious to get up a fight with Brown, of Bridgnorth, but as the
latter would not come to the scratch under £500, for the present the
match went off, Ward’s friends not being strong in the shiners to that
extent. The challenge, however, was again sent by Brown, and accepted at
the price by Ward, in May, but went off after much dispute on the point
of fighting on a stage, Brown declining to fight on turf. To this Ward’s
backers would not allow him to agree. Their objection was that a stage
fight with so big a man would be such a manifest disadvantage to Ward,
that it would be throwing away too great a chance. Brown, they urged,
would fight all fifteen stone, while Ward would be twelve stone four
pounds to twelve stone seven pounds; and it must be obvious that on a
stage a heavier body propelled against a lighter must increase the
danger to the latter, as the chances were that the lesser man would more
frequently come in contact with the rails, planks, or skirting boards,
and thus suffer twofold punishment from blows and contusions. At a
meeting at Tom Cribb’s, in April, 1827, they said, “It was true that
Ward himself had no objection to the stage, that he would as soon fight
Brown there, or even in a saw-pit, and it was only to be lamented that
Brown did not show a similar spirit. It was their duty to curb the
natural and courageous impulses of Ward’s heart, and to mix up, on his
behalf, prudence with valour. The stake to be fought for was not only
great in a pecuniary point of view, but great in point of glory, for the
winner would be champion of England. This was a prize of too much
magnitude to be treated lightly, or to be risked without due foresight,
and without equality in point of advantage.” Cribb, on the part of
Brown, could not make the match except on the terms authorised by Brown
himself, and therefore nothing was done. A long angry correspondence,
not worth preserving, ensued, in the course of which Brown offered to
stake £320 to Ward’s £300, if Ward would fight on a stage. Ward, on the
other hand, offered to fight for £100 a-side on a stage, or for £300, or
even £1,000 a-side, on turf. This was declined by Brown. Finally, the
question of superiority was decided in another way. Phil. Sampson
(thrice defeated by Ward), challenged Brown, and beat him, April 28,
1828, after forty-two hard-fought rounds in forty-nine minutes. This, in
the judgment of those who can get “a line” by the comparison of
performances, set at rest the question of the respective merits of Brown
and Ward.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account