Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 3 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-40, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863Miles, Henry Downes
History
Pugilistica: The History of British Boxing, Volume 3 (of 3): Containing Lives of the Most Celebrated Pugilists; Full Reports of Their Battles from Contemporary Newspapers, With Authentic Portraits, Personal Anecdotes, and Sketches of the Principal Patrons of the Prize Ring, Forming a Complete History of the Ring from Fig and Broughton, 1719-40, to the Last Championship Battle Between King and Heenan, in December 1863
Miles, Henry Downes
Boxing
Caunt did not return from the country till the following morning. His
feelings may be more easily conceived than described. Both himself and
his wife were so deeply affected as to excite the commiseration of all
classes.
The last appearance of our ponderous hero in the P.R. was one that
adds no leaf of laurel to his pugilistic biography. Some absurd family
quarrels (Nat Langham had married a relative of Mrs. Caunt), together
with some petty trade jealousy, (Nat being the popular landlord of the
“Cambrian Stores,” Castle Street, Leicester Square, hard by Big Ben’s
“Coach and Horses”), gave rise to all sorts of unpleasant
personalities on more than one occasion. Nat, though a civil and,
except professionally, non-combative sort of fellow, having over and
over again expressed his opinion that Caunt had no pretensions to
pugilistic honours beyond the possession of unwieldy bulk and clumsy
strength, and further, that “he couldn’t hit him (Nat) in a month of
Sundays,” the feud, aggravated by crabbed old Ben Butler and Mrs.
Caunt, assumed the bitterness of a family feud, and finally Ben
proposed and “Ould Nat” accepted a challenge to settle this
“difference of opinion” in the manner and form prescribed by the fair
rules and regulations of British boxing. The articles were formulated
on the 16th of May, 1857, by which, and a deposit of £10 a side, the
parties agreed to stake £200 a side in instalments, the battle to come
off on the 23rd of the ensuing September. It is regrettable to find
that the “feud of kindred” received yet another proof of its exceeding
intensity over all ordinary quarrels among strangers. At the second
deposit Nat (he was going out of town) actually left his £10 with the
final stakeholder a week before it was due, whereon Caunt and Co.
appealed to the “letter of the articles,” which declared that the
“said deposits should be made at the times and places hereinafter
mentioned,” and claimed forfeit of the money down; although the “final
stakeholder, to whom all deposits should be paid over in time for
insertion in _Bell’s Life in London_” had actually given notice to
“uncle Butler,” (Caunt being away at Brighton,) of the previous
deposit of the money in his hands. This quibbling plea was, however,
repudiated by Caunt himself, as will be seen below, and the match went
on:――
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account