Pyrotechnics: The History and Art of Firework MakingBrock, Alan St. H. (Alan St. Hill)
History
Pyrotechnics: The History and Art of Firework Making
Brock, Alan St. H. (Alan St. Hill)
Fireworks
This was in 1635. Over one hundred years later, Frézier describes
an almost exactly similar firework under the heading “Artifices
Portatifs,” which name he adopts instead of the old name “Lance à feu,”
in order to avoid confusion with the lance as known to-day, which was
then coming into use.
This is the only mention he makes of anything that can be considered
to even remotely resemble a Roman candle, and as he refers to several
other writers, a justifiable inference seems to be that neither he or
they had any knowledge of such a firework. Had he known of it, such is
its popularity he would certainly have mentioned it.
Eighteen years later Jones describes exactly the Roman candle as made
to-day, to which he gives the name “Fire Pump.”
“Pumps” and “Pumps with Starrs” occur in the description subjoined to
engravings depicting English peace displays in 1697 and 1713; there
can be no doubt that the reference is to Roman candles or the earlier
development of them.
When, however, the elder Ruggieri came over to this country in 1749 to
conduct the Aix-la-Chapelle peace display in Green Park, in conjunction
with Sarti, no firework of this nature appears in the programme of the
display.
Here we have two pyrotechnists who can be considered to represent
the best skill of France and Italy; in fact, it was Ruggieri whose
arrival in France from Italy in or about 1735 marked the great advance
in pyrotechny in the former country. Yet the “Pump” does not appear in
this great display planned and executed by them, although for years it
had been a popular item in displays in this country. The obvious reason
for this omission is that they did not know of it.
In the early part of the nineteenth century the name “Roman candle”
comes into use both here and in France. The “English Encyclopædia”
of 1802 still uses the expression “Fire Pump,” but this is probably
because their article is copied almost verbatim from Jones’ book. The
name Roman candle, however, appears in an advertisement of a display
at Ipswich by William Brock in 1818, and Ruggieri the younger uses the
words “chandelle romaine” in his book of 1805.
How this firework received the name Roman is obscure; it may have been
affixed by one of the many Italian pyrotechnists working here, or it
may have had political or religious significance.
A firework functioning in the same way as a Roman candle is the Italian
streamer, which has stars of a composition containing lampblack, which
burn with a gold fire and leave a tail in their flight.
The Roman candle of the present day is made with an almost endless
variety of stars, but those in use when the name was first introduced
were of very simple character. Coloured stars, as accepted to-day, were
not introduced until about the thirtieth year of the last century.
The compositions given by Jones and Ruggieri would produce
approximately the same effect as the Italian streamer star of to-day,
but with little or no tail.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account