Pythagoras and the Delphic mysteriesSchuré, Edouard
Religion
Pythagoras and the Delphic mysteries
Schuré, Edouard
Mysteries, Religious; Pythagoras and Pythagorean school
Quite recently Charles du Prel has advanced the same
opinion, supporting it with numerous facts and
details in a well-written volume, _Philosophie
der Mystik_ (1886). He starts from this fact: the
consciousness of the ego does not exhaust its
object. “Soul and consciousness are not two adequate
terms; they do not cover one another as they have
not an equal scope. The sphere of the soul far
surpasses that of the consciousness.” Consequently
there is _a latent ego_ in us. This latent ego,
which manifests itself in sleep and in dreams, is
the real ego, supra-terrestrial and transcendent,
whose existence precedes our terrestrial ego which
is bound to the body. The terrestrial ego is
perishable, the transcendent ego is immortal. This
is what St. Paul meant when he said--“----the Lord
Jesus Christ, who shall change our vile body, so
that it be fashioned like unto His glorious body.”
[10] Origen states that Pythagoras was the inventor of
physiognomy.
[11] _Katharsis_ in Greek.
[12] In transcendent mathematics it is demonstrated
algebraically that zero multiplied by infinity is
equal to One. Zero, in the order of absolute things,
signifies the indeterminate Being. The Infinite,
the Eternal in the language of the temples, was
marked by a circle of a serpent biting its tail,
signifying the Infinite moving itself. Now, once the
Infinite is determined it produces all the numbers
it contains in its great unity, and which it governs
in perfect harmony.
Such is the transcendent meaning of the first problem
of the Pythagorean theogony, the reason which brings it
to pass that the great Monad contains all the small
ones, and that all the numbers spring from the great
Unity in movement.
[13] Doctrine identical with that of the initiate St.
Paul, who speaks of the _spiritual body_.
[14] In the first rank of these must be placed Fabre
d’Olivet (_Vers dorés de Pythagore_). This living
conception of the forces of the universe, traversing
it from top to bottom, has nothing to do with the
_thesis_, the _antithesis_ and the _synthesis_ of
Hegel, which are simply _jeux d’esprit_.
[15] In Greek: _Teleiôtes_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account