Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Queens -- Great Britain -- Biography; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
England at the present moment'; and he delivered his note to the
Ambassador without having previously submitted it to the Queen or to
the Prime Minister. Naturally, when this was discovered, there was a
serious storm. The Prince was especially indignant; the conduct of the
draymen he regarded, with disgust and alarm, as 'a slight foretaste of
what an unregulated mass of illiterate people is capable'; and
Palmerston {173} was requested by Lord John to withdraw his note, and
to substitute for it another from which all censure of the General had
been omitted. On this the Foreign Secretary threatened resignation,
but the Prime Minister was firm. For a moment the royal hopes rose
high, only to be dashed to the ground again by the cruel compliance of
the enemy. Palmerston, suddenly lamb-like, agreed to everything; the
note was withdrawn and altered, and peace was patched up once more.[24]
It lasted for a year, and then, in October 1851, the arrival of Kossuth
in England brought on another crisis. Palmerston's desire to receive
the Hungarian patriot at his house in London was vetoed by Lord John;
once more there was a sharp struggle; once more Palmerston, after
threatening resignation, yielded. But still the insubordinate man
could not keep quiet. A few weeks later a deputation of Radicals from
Finsbury and Islington waited on him at the Foreign Office and
presented him with an address, in which the Emperors of Austria and
Russia were stigmatised as 'odious and detestable assassins' and
'merciless tyrants and despots.' The Foreign Secretary in his reply,
while mildly deprecating these expressions, allowed his real sentiments
to appear with a most undiplomatic _insouciance_. There was an
immediate scandal, and the Court flowed over with rage and
vituperation. 'I think,' said the Baron, 'the man has been for some
time insane.' Victoria, in an agitated letter, urged Lord John to
assert his authority. But Lord John perceived that on this matter the
Foreign Secretary had the support of public opinion, and he judged it
wiser to bide his time.[25]
{174}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account