Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas
History
Race Distinctions in American Law
Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas
African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations
did not wish to be understood as criticising the system of separate
public schools for the races, but that his censure was directed at the
penal provision of the Kentucky law involved in this case, which he
considered unconstitutional, and so vitiating the whole statute.
EXCLUSION OF JAPANESE FROM PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF SAN FRANCISCO
The second incident, which opened the question of the separation of the
races in schools and which led to international comment, was the
exclusion of the Japanese children from the public schools of the city
of San Francisco. A law was enacted by the California Legislature[340]
on March 12, 1872, which provided that school trustees should have the
power to establish separate schools for Indian children and for the
children of Mongolian and Chinese descent, and, when separate schools
were furnished, to keep Indian, Mongolian, and Chinese children from
attending any other school. The law was amended[341] in 1880, 1885,
1891, 1893, 1895, and 1903, but the provision for separation of the
races remained essentially unchanged. This law was not enforced until
1901, when the labor vote became predominant. Then, according to
Secretary Metcalf,[342] who investigated the conditions, the labor
unionists began a crusade to exclude the Japanese laborers from
California, as the Chinese had already been excluded. On May 6, 1905,
the Board of Education of San Francisco passed the following resolution:
“That the Board of Education is determined in its efforts to effect the
establishment of separate schools for Chinese and Japanese pupils, not
only for the purpose of relieving the congestion at present prevailing
in our schools, but also for the higher end that our children should not
be placed in any position where their youthful impressions may be
affected by association with pupils of the Mongolian race.” On October
1, 1906, the Board took the next step and adopted this resolution: “That
in accordance with Article X, Section 1662, of the school law of
California, principals are hereby directed to send all Chinese, Japanese
or Korean children to the Oriental Public School, situated on the south
side of Cary street between Powell and Mason streets, on and after
Monday, October 15, 1906.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account