Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas
History
Race Distinctions in American Law
Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas
African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations
The first case to reach the Supreme Court of the United States involving
the separation of white and colored passengers on cars was one brought
against the Washington, Alexandria, and Georgetown Railroad Company, in
1873. This road was chartered by Congress in 1863 with the provision
that no person should be excluded from the cars on account of color. A
Negro woman, with an ordinary first-class ticket, was made to ride in a
separate coach precisely like that used by the white passengers. The
court ruled[534] that the Act of 1863 meant that persons of color should
travel in the same cars as white persons without any distinction being
made; that, therefore, the law was not satisfied by the company’s
providing cars assigned exclusively to persons of color, though they
were as good as those assigned to white passengers.
In 1869, the Louisiana[535] legislature passed a law prohibiting
railroad, street car, and steamboat companies from making any
discrimination on account of race or color. In the often-cited case of
Hall v. DeCuir,[536] a test case arising under this act in 1875, the
Supreme Court ruled that the Louisiana act was unconstitutional because
it was an interference with interstate commerce. Chief Justice Waite, in
delivering the opinion of the court, said: “If each State was at liberty
to regulate the conduct of carriers while within its jurisdiction, the
confusion likely to follow could not but be productive of great
inconvenience and unnecessary hardship.” This case has stood as a
warning to the Southern States that they must be careful to mention in
their “Jim Crow” laws that they apply only to intrastate passengers.
But, as will be seen later, though this case has not been overruled, it
has been refined upon.
In a case[537] arising in the Federal District Court of Texas in 1877,
it was held that for a railroad employee to deny to a passenger the
right to ride in the only car appropriated for the use of ladies,
because she was a colored woman, was a violation of the Civil Rights
Bill. But the judge, in charging the jury at the trial, said that, if
there were two cars equally fit and appropriate, then the white and
colored passengers might be separated.
The above are only a few of the many cases which arose between 1865 and
1881, involving the separation of white and colored passengers; they are
cited to show that, in the absence of legislative authority, many of the
public conveyance companies had regulations of their own separating the
races. The “Jim Crow” laws, in other words, coming later, did scarcely
more than to legalize an existing and widespread custom.
SEPARATION OF PASSENGERS ON STEAMBOATS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account