Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas
History
Race Distinctions in American Law
Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas
African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations
Footnote 582:
Acts of Va., 1901, extra sess., pp. 212–13; 1901–02, pp. 639–40.
Footnote 583:
Acts of Tenn., 1903, p. 75.
Footnote 584:
Laws of S. C., 1905, p. 954.
Footnote 585:
Raleigh, N. C., _News and Observer_, Nov. 23, 1906.
Footnote 586:
Walden v. Vicksburg Ry. and Light Co., 1906, 40 S. 751.
Footnote 587:
State v. Patterson, 1905, 39 S. 398, at p. 400.
Footnote 588:
Pub. Laws of N. C., 1909, p. 1256.
CHAPTER X
NEGRO IN COURT ROOM
The Negro goes into a court room in one or more of six capacities,
namely: as spectator, witness, juror, party to a suit, attorney, or
judge. It is in each of these capacities that the Negro in the court
room is to be considered, but some of them permit of only brief mention.
How the Negro actually fares in the court room—whether he gets justice
as often as the white person does, whether his testimony has as much
weight with the jury and court as that of the white witness, whether the
Negro attorney or judge is accorded as much courtesy as the white man in
a similar position—would make an interesting and profitable study, but
such a study is largely outside the field of this investigation. It
should be kept in mind now, as in the previous chapters, that only those
distinctions are considered which have come within the pale of the law
since 1865, either in the form of statutory enactment or judicial
decision. Where mention is made of some of the actual extralegal race
distinctions in the court room, it is only for illustration.
AS SPECTATOR
The court room, while the court is in session, is open to all citizens,
regardless of race or color. No instance has been found either in the
statutes or judicial reports of one’s admission to or exclusion from the
court room being dependent upon his race or color. It is to be noticed,
however, in Southern court rooms that the spectators are separated by
race, Negroes usually occupying seats on one side of the room and white
people on the other. This must be entirely a matter of custom, as no
case has been found of such separation being required by law or
ordinance. While this point has not been deemed important enough for a
special investigation, it is presumed that one will find the races
separated in the court room in those States or communities where they
are separated in other places—as in public conveyances, schools, and
churches.
A Negro in the South, as elsewhere, has, legally and actually, as good
an opportunity to observe court proceedings as a white person, though
custom may require him to sit in a different part of the court room from
that occupied by the latter.
AS JUDGE
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account