Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas
History
Race Distinctions in American Law
Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas
African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations
The validity of the proposed Maryland amendment is directly dependent
upon the invalidity of the Fifteenth Amendment. Under the proposed
amendment, no property qualification whatever is required of _white_
male citizens applying for registration, while a heavy property
qualification is required of _every other_ male citizen—and this must
include Negroes—applying for registration. Thus, in violation of the
Fifteenth Amendment, the right of citizens of the United States to vote
would be denied or abridged by the State of Maryland on account of race
or color.
The validity of the Fifteenth Amendment is questioned on the following
grounds, among others: (1) The fifth article of the Federal Constitution
provides that Congress, “whenever two-thirds of both houses shall deem
it necessary,” shall propose amendments to the Constitution. It is
claimed that only thirty-nine of the sixty-six members of the Senate,
less than two-thirds, voted to submit the Fifteenth Amendment to the
States for their ratification. (2) Maryland was one of the two
States—the other being Delaware—that refused to ratify either the
Thirteenth, Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendment. It is claimed, therefore,
that Maryland is not bound by the Fifteenth Amendment, which it did not
ratify. (3) The fifth article of the Constitution, after providing the
two ways in which the Constitution may be amended, adds that “no State,
without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the
Senate.” Upon this last clause, Mr. Arthur W. Machen, Jr., in a recent
article in _The Harvard Law Review_,[730] has founded an ingenious
argument that the Fifteenth Amendment is void. His reasoning on this
point is, in brief, that the State meant here is the citizens or voters
or the government of the State, and not the territory. By the
enfranchisement of the Negroes after the War, the composition of the
State was changed, a body of persons became part of the State who were
not a part of it before, and thus the State was deprived of its equal
suffrage in the Senate. Mr. Machen says: “The Fifteenth Amendment
amounts to a compulsory annexation to each State that refused to ratify
it of a black San Domingo within its borders. It is no less
objectionable than the annexation of the San Domingo in the Spanish
main.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account