Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas
History
Race Distinctions in American Law
Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas
African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations
The Episcopal Church has probably had the most difficulty with the race
problem. This Church has had no separate organization for Negroes. Both
races meet together in the annual diocese conventions, without
distinction, and participate in the business of the Church. At one of
these conventions, held at Tarboro, North Carolina, in 1907, the
following resolution was passed: “That the time has come when the
welfare of both races in the Southern States requires that each race
should have its own ecclesiastical legislative assemblies, and that we
urge the General Convention to take immediate action.” The colored
clergy and congregations had already expressed their willingness to
submit the whole matter to the general convention. In speaking for
separation, Bishop Cheshire, of North Carolina, said: “I have come to
this conclusion in spite of the sentiments and convictions of a
lifetime, and though my mind and conscience compel my assent to this
necessity, my heart still clings to the old ideal of a church and a
diocese which in its annual gatherings should represent visibly the
oneness of all races and colors in Christ.... We must confront the
actual facts of the day. I believe that, in one way or another, both the
white race and the colored race, consciously or unconsciously, demand a
different arrangement of our ecclesiastical institutions. I believe that
some separate organization for our colored work is coming in the near
future.”[304] At the general convention, which met in Richmond,
Virginia, in October, 1907, the question of the separation of the races
was much discussed, but the actual outcome has not been learned. It
developed in the debate that the Southern bishops desired separation,
wishing to be relieved of the burden of the Negroes in their dioceses,
while the bishops from other sections preferred the present arrangement,
not desiring to be burdened with a class of people not in their
dioceses.[305]
The Young Men’s Christian Associations of the Northern cities have to
meet the problem of the Negro. The New Haven, Connecticut, people
refused to permit Negroes to attend the Y. M. C. A., and a separate
building had to be provided for them.[306]
Within the colored church itself there is manifest a conflict between
the Negroes proper and mulattoes. There is a town in North Carolina in
which they have practical separation in the churches, the black Negroes
going to one church and the bright mulattoes to another. A similar
separation of the Negroes and mulattoes in churches exists, to some
extent, in Charleston, South Carolina. At a Negro Christian Congress at
Washington City, in 1906, the chairman of the meeting was charged with
removing from the program dark-skinned men and substituting
light-skinned men. It provoked such a discussion as to divide the
meeting into two factions.[307]
NEGROES IN THE MILITIA
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account