Horse racing -- Australia -- History; Race horses -- Australia -- History; Stainforth, Martin, 1866-1957
The answer to these objections is that, just as a genius _sometimes_
comes from a back-lane; just as a poet is born in a hovel; just as some
great orator comes from a peasant stock; so with a sprinter for a sire
we get sometimes a stayer. This would have been explained by Darwin by
his theory of Atavism—throwing back to a former ancestor for hidden
powers—and this is a reasonable explanation. Thus we may reasonably say
that David, through his granddam Wakeful, did inherit some of her
ancestor Musket’s power to stay. But this leads up to another
explanation that can be put forth with plenty of examples to back it
up—i.e., that the horse may get his staying powers from his _mother_:
that is, that he has inherited his dam’s heart, not his sire’s.
Eurythmic must be regarded as an excellent example of this, for, as we
have just mentioned, Eudorus was but a good miler, and his other sons do
not show staying powers in spite of the fact that Eusebius won a Derby
and a V.R.C. St. Leger, both, however, in shocking time! But when we
come to examine the pedigree of Bob Cherry, the dam of Eurythmic, we
find that staying is spelt in every line of her pedigree, being by
Bodadil from Ardea by Wallace.
Now that I have enunciated my theory, let me suggest why it is that some
horses begin their career in brilliant fashion, and look from their
first performances as though they would stay, and yet go off and never
come back. My opinion is that some of these horses have poor hearts and
are made too much use of during their two-year-old period; while some
horses during their early three-year-old career are asked to do more
than their hearts are fit to do, as a consequence their _hearts become
dilated_. They fail time after time, and are consequently called rogues;
in reality, they may be quite honest animals, but their strained hearts
cannot respond when called upon—Bigaroon, I think, is an example.
I regard the failure of Eurythmic, when matched against Beauford, as an
instance of the dilated heart. Eurythmic was asked to carry the record
weight of 10.7 in the Futurity Stakes. He won, and critics said that it
was merely a welter race, and that he had nothing to beat. When he came
to Sydney to run against Beauford, almost every trainer gave their
opinion that Eurythmic would win. What happened? He pulled up absolutely
in distress, and a few days later was beaten by David and Furious over
two miles. The real explanation is that no matter what may be said to
the contrary, Eurythmic did not have a true staying heart, having
inherited it from his mother; that it probably became strained in the
Futurity and probably dilated, and that while he may win at a mile or a
little more, I think it unlikely that he will ever win at two miles
again.[1]
Footnote 1:
This was written in April, 1922.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account