measurements (see above table) recorded by Becquerel. Quite apart from
the special assumptions required for such a quantitative comparison of
theory with experiment, there can be little doubt that the increase of
value of _H_ρ with distance can be satisfactorily explained as a
consequence of the complex character of the pencil of rays[147].
Becquerel states that the amount of deviation, in a given magnetic
field, was the same for the α rays of polonium and of radium. This shows
that the value of
_m_
---- _V_
_e_
is the same for the α rays from the two substances. Since the α rays
from polonium are far more readily absorbed than the α rays from radium,
this result would indicate that the value of _m_/_e_ is greater for the
α particles of polonium than of radium. Further experimental evidence is
required on this important point.
=93. Charge carried by the α rays=. We have seen that the negative
charge carried by the β particles has been readily measured. Since there
is reason to believe (section 229) that four α particles are expelled
from radium for each β particle, it is to be expected that the positive
charge carried by the α particles should be determined still more
readily. All the initial experiments, however, made to detect this
charge, gave negative results; and, before successful results were
obtained, it was found necessary to eliminate some secondary actions,
which at first completely masked the effects to be looked for.
In consequence of the importance of this question, a brief account will
be given of the methods of measurement adopted and the special
experimental difficulties which have arisen.
In the first place, it must be remembered that only a small fraction of
the α rays, emitted from a layer of powdered radium bromide, escape into
the surrounding gas. On account of the ease with which the α rays are
stopped in their passage through matter, only those escape which are
expelled from a superficial layer, and the rest are absorbed by the
radium itself. On the other hand, a much larger proportion of the β rays
escape, on account of their greater power of penetration. In the second
place, the α particle is a far more efficient ionizer of the gas than
the β particle, and, in consequence, if the charge carried by the α rays
is to be determined by methods similar to those employed for the β rays
(see section 80), the pressure of the gas surrounding the conductor to
be charged must be very small in order to eliminate, as far as possible,
the loss of charge resulting from the ionization of the residual gas by
the α rays[148].
The experimental arrangement used by the writer is shown in Fig. 33.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account