In order to test the amount of absorption of the α rays for different
thicknesses of matter, an apparatus similar to that shown in Fig. 17, p.
98, was employed[158]. A thin layer of the active material was spread
uniformly over an area of about 30 sq. cms., and the saturation current
observed between two plates 3·5 cms. apart. With a thin layer[159] of
active material, the ionization between the plates is due almost
entirely to the α rays. The ionization due to the β and γ rays is
generally less than 1% of the total.
The following table shows the variation of the saturation current
between the plates due to the α rays from radium and polonium, with
successive layers of aluminium foil interposed, each ·00034 cm. in
thickness. In order to get rid of the ionization due to the β rays from
radium, the radium chloride employed was dissolved in water and
evaporated. This renders the active compound, for the time, nearly free
from β rays.
The initial current with 1 layer of aluminium over the active material
is taken as 100. It will be observed that the current due
_Polonium._ _Radium._
Layers of Current Ratio of Layers of Current Ratio of
aluminium decrease aluminium decrease
for each for each
layer layer
0 100 0 100
·41 ·48
1 41 1 48
·31 ·48
2 12·6 2 23
·17 ·60
3 2·1 3 13·6
·067 ·47
4 ·14 4 6·4
·39
5 0 5 2·5
·36
6 ·9
7 0
to the radium rays decreases very nearly by half its value for each
additional thickness until the current is reduced to about 6% of the
maximum. It then decays more rapidly to zero. Thus, for radium, over a
wide range, the current decreases approximately according to an
exponential law with the thickness of the screen, or
$$ \frac {i} {i₀} = e^{λ d} $$,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account