Platinum 1·167
Mercury ·726 ·661 ·538 ·493
Lead ·641 ·563 ·480 ·440
Zinc ·282 ·266 ·248 ·266
Aluminium ·104 ·104 ·104 ·104
Glass ·087 ·087 ·087 ·087
Water ·034 ·034 ·034 ·034
In the above table, the absorption in aluminium, glass and water was too
small to determine with accuracy the variation of λ with distance
traversed. It will be observed that, for the denser substances, the
coefficient of absorption decreases with the distance through which the
rays have passed. This indicates that the rays are heterogeneous. The
variation of λ is more marked in heavy substances.
Table B gives the values of λ divided by density for the above numbers.
If the absorption were directly proportional to the density, the
quotient would be the same in all cases.
TABLE B.
λ _divided by density_.
Substance I II III IV
Platinum ·054
Mercury ·053 ·048 ·039 ·036
Lead ·056 ·049 ·042 ·037
Zinc ·039 ·037 ·034 ·033
Aluminium ·038 ·038 ·038 ·038
Glass ·034 ·034 ·034 ·034
Water ·034 ·034 ·034 ·034
The numbers in column I vary considerably, but the agreement becomes
closer in the succeeding columns, until in column IV the absorption is
very nearly proportional to the density.
It is seen that the absorption of all three types of rays from
radio-active substances is approximately proportional to the density of
the substance traversed—a relation first observed by Lenard for the
cathode rays. This law of absorption thus holds for both positively and
negatively electrified particles projected from the radio-active
substances, and also for the electromagnetic pulses which are believed
to constitute the γ rays; although the absorption of the α rays, for
example, is 10,000 times greater than for the γ rays. We have seen in
section 84 that the value of the absorption constant λ for lead is 122
for the β rays from uranium. The value for the γ rays from radium varies
between ·64 and ·44, showing that the γ rays are more than 200 times as
penetrating as the β rays.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account