The secondary radiation set up by Röntgen rays, like that due to the β
and γ rays, consists in part of electrons projected with considerable
velocity. These three types of rays seem about equally efficient in
causing the expulsion of electrons from the substance through which they
pass. We have seen that the X and γ rays are, in all probability,
electromagnetic pulses set up by the sudden starting or stopping of
electrons, and, since these rays in turn cause the removal of electrons,
the process appears to be reversible. Since the β rays pass through some
thickness of matter before their energy of motion is arrested, theory
would lead us to expect that a type of soft X rays should be generated
in the absorbing matter.
PART VI.
=113. Comparison of the ionization produced by the α and β rays=. With
unscreened active material the ionization produced between two parallel
plates, placed as in Fig. 17, is mainly due to the α rays. On account of
the slight penetrating power of the α rays, the current due to them
practically reaches a maximum with a small thickness of radio-active
material. The following saturation currents were observed[181] for
different thicknesses of uranium oxide between parallel plates
sufficiently far apart for all the α rays to be absorbed in the gas
between them.
_Surface of uranium oxide 38 sq. cms._
Weight of uranium Saturation current
oxide in grammes per in amperes per sq.
sq. cm. of surface cm. of surface
·0036 1·7 × 10⁻¹³
·0096 3·2 × 10⁻¹³
·0189 4·0 × 10⁻¹³
·0350 4·4 × 10⁻¹³
·0955 4·7 × 10⁻¹³
The current reached about half its maximum value for a weight of oxide
·0055 gr. per sq. cm. If the α rays are cut off by a metallic screen,
the ionization is then mainly due to the β rays, since the ionization
produced by the γ rays is small in comparison. For the β rays from
uranium oxide it has been shown (section 86) that the current reaches
half its maximum value for a thickness of 0·11 gr. per sq. cm.
Meyer and Schweidler[182] have found that the radiation from a water
solution of uranium nitrate is very nearly proportional to the amount of
uranium present in the solution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account