This effect can, I think, be simply accounted for by taking into
consideration the difference in conductivity of the gas on the two sides
of the radium coated vane. If a small vane, coated uniformly with radium
on both sides, and mounted on an insulating support, be brought near a
charged body kept at a constant potential, it acts like a water dropper
and rapidly acquires very nearly the average potential which existed at
that point before the vane was brought up. The mechanical force acting
on the vane will, in consequence, be small. If, however, the vane is
only coated with radium on the side near the charged body, the
ionization and consequently the conductivity of the gas is much greater
between the vane and the charged body than on the opposite side.
Suppose, for simplicity, the body is charged to a positive potential. On
account of the greater conductivity of the gas on the side facing the
charged body, it will rapidly acquire a positive charge, and the
potential of the vane will reach a higher value than existed at that
place before the vane was introduced. This will result in a repulsion of
the vane. This also accounts for the attraction observed in the
experiment with the Coulomb’s balance already referred to. Suppose that
one sphere is positively charged and the other earthed, and the two
vanes metallically connected together. The vane next to the charged body
will become charged positively, but this charge will be dissipated
rapidly on account of the ionization of the gas close to the opposite
vane, and, in most conditions, this loss of charge will be so rapid that
the potential of the vane is unable to reach the value which would exist
at that place in the field, if the vane were removed. There will, in
consequence, be an attracting force acting on the vane towards the
sphere.
The repulsion observed by Joly is thus only an indirect result of the
ionization in the gas produced by the radium, and should be shown under
conditions where similar unequal distribution of ionization is produced
by any other sources.
Since radium gives out heat at a fairly rapid rate, a radiometer in
which the vanes were coated on one side with radium instead of
lampblack, should rotate at low pressure of the gas, even if no source
of light is brought near it. This should evidently be the case, since
the face coated with radium should reach a slightly higher temperature
than the other. This experiment has been tried, but the effect seems too
small to produce rotation of the vanes.
Chemical actions.
=123.= Rays from active radium preparations change oxygen into
ozone[210]. Its presence can be detected by the smell or by the action
on iodide of potassium paper. This effect is due to the α and β rays
from the radium, and not to the luminous rays from it. Since energy is
required to produce ozone from oxygen, this must be derived from the
energy of the radiations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account