With a longer time of exposure to the emanation, the ratio of the
increase after removal is much less marked. For a day’s exposure, the
activity after removal begins at once to diminish. In this case, the
increase of activity of the matter deposited in the last few hours does
not compensate for the decrease of activity of the active matter as a
whole, and consequently the activity at once commences to decay. This
increase of activity with time explains the initial irregularity in the
recovery curve, for the active matter deposited during the first few
hours takes some time to reach its maximum activity, and the initial
activity is, in consequence, smaller than would be expected from the
equation.
The increase of activity on a rod exposed for a short interval in the
presence of the thorium emanation has been further investigated by Miss
Brooks. The curve _C_ in Fig. 65 shows the variation with time of the
activity of a brass rod exposed for 10 minutes in the emanation vessel
filled with dust-free air. The excited activity after removal increased
in the course of 3·7 hours to five times its initial value, and
afterwards decayed at the normal rate. The dotted line curve _D_
represents the variation of activity to be expected if the activity
decayed exponentially with the time. The explanation of this remarkable
action is considered in detail in section 207.
[Illustration: Fig. 65.]
=181. Effect of dust on the distribution of excited activity.= Miss
Brooks[274], working in the Cavendish Laboratory, observed that the
excited activity due to the thorium emanation appeared in some cases on
the anode in an electric field, and that the distribution of excited
activity varied in an apparently capricious manner. This effect was
finally traced to the presence of dust in the air of the emanation
vessel. For example, with an exposure of 5 minutes the amount of excited
activity to be observed on a rod depended on the time that the air had
been allowed to remain undisturbed in the emanation vessel beforehand.
The effect increased with the time of standing, and was a maximum after
about 18 hours. The amount of excited activity obtained on the rod was
then about 20 times as great as the amount observed for air freshly
introduced. The activity of this rod did not increase after removal, but
with fresh air, the excited activity, for an exposure of 5 minutes,
increased to five or six times its initial value.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account