As in the case of the excited activity from thorium, the rate of decay
of the excited activity from radium is for the most part independent of
the nature of the body made active. Curie and Danne (_loc. cit._)
observed that the active bodies gave off an emanation itself capable of
exciting activity in neighbouring bodies. This property rapidly
disappeared, and was inappreciable 2 hours after removal. In certain
substances like celluloid and caoutchouc, the decay of activity is very
much slower than for the metals. This effect becomes more marked with
increase of time of exposure to the emanation. A similar effect is
exhibited by lead, but to a less marked degree. During the time the
activity lasts, these substances continue to give off an emanation.
It is probable that these divergencies from the general law are not due
to an actual change in the rate of decay of the true excited activity
but to an occlusion of the emanation by these substances during the
interval of exposure. After exposure the emanation gradually diffuses
out, and thus the activity due to this occluded emanation and the
excited activity produced by it decays very slowly with the time.
=183. Active deposit of very slow decay.= M. and Mme Curie[277] have
observed that bodies which have been exposed for a long interval in the
presence of the radium emanation do not lose all their activity. The
excited activity at first decays rapidly at the normal rate, falling to
half value in about 28 minutes, but a residual activity, which they
state is of the order of ½0,000 of the initial activity, always
remains. A similar effect was observed by Giesel. The writer has
examined the variation of this residual activity, and has found that it
increases for several years. The results are discussed in detail in
chapter XI. It will there be shown that this active deposit of slow
transformation contains the radio-active constituents present in
polonium, radio-tellurium and radio-lead.
[Illustration: Fig. 69.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account