$$ \frac {I_t} {I_T} = \frac {e^{–λ_3 t} − e^{–λ_2 t}}
{e^{–λ_3 T} − e^{–λ_2 T}} $$,
where _I_{T}_ is the maximum activity observed, which is reached after
an interval _T_. Since the activity finally decays according to an
exponential law (half value in 28 minutes), one of the values of λ is
equal to 4·13 × 10⁻⁴. As in the case of thorium and actinium, the
experimental curves do not allow us to settle whether this value of λ is
to be given to λ₂ or λ₃. From other data (see section 226) it will be
shown later that it must refer to λ₃. Thus λ₃ = 4·13 × 10⁻⁴ (sec)⁻¹.
The experimental curve agrees very closely with theory if λ₂ = 5·38 ×
10⁻⁴ (sec)⁻¹.
The agreement between theory and experiment is shown by the table given
below. The maximum value _I_{T}_ (which is taken as 100) is reached at a
time _T_ = 36 minutes.
In order to obtain the β-ray curve, the following procedure was adopted.
A layer of thin aluminium was placed inside a glass tube, which was then
exhausted. A large quantity of radium emanation was then suddenly
introduced by opening a stop-cock communicating with the emanation
vessel, which was at atmospheric pressure. The emanation was left in the
tube for 1·5 minutes and then was rapidly swept out by a current of air.
The aluminium was then removed and was placed under an electroscope,
such as is shown in Fig. 12. The α rays from the aluminium were cut off
by an interposed screen of aluminium ·1 mm. thick. The time was reckoned
from a period of 45 seconds after the introduction of the emanation.
Time in Theoretical Observed
minutes value of value of
activity activity
0 0 0
10 58·1 55
20 88·6 86
30 97·3 97
36 100 100
40 99·8 99·5
50 93·4 92
60 83·4 82
80 63·7 61·5
100 44·8 42·5
120 30·8 29
There is thus a good agreement between the calculated and observed
values of the activity measured by the β rays.
The results are satisfactorily explained if it is supposed:—
(1) That the change B into C (half transformed in 21 minutes) does
not give rise to β rays;
(2) That the change C into D (half transformed in 28 minutes) gives
rise to β rays.
=222.= These conclusions are very strongly supported by observations of
the decay measured by the β rays for a long exposure. The curve of decay
is shown in Fig. 88 and Fig. 89, curve I.
[Illustration: Fig. 89.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account