Railroads -- United States; Railroads -- United States -- Finance
Gentlemen: Since the time you were previously requested to
take up the reorganization of the Richmond Terminal system
much time and thought have been devoted to its affairs, and we
realize that adverse financial conditions and also the present
general distrust of all plans for the restoration of this
system require that, to be successful, its reorganization must
be undertaken by parties possessing the confidence of both the
securityholders and the public, and also the financial strength
sufficient for its accomplishment. We therefore ask you to take
up this reorganization of the Richmond Terminal and its allied
properties, each pledging you our personal support and aid in
full confidence that the securityholders will support us in this
request.
We appreciate the labor and responsibility connected with this
undertaking, and are therefore willing to do all in our power
to give you full control of the reorganization, as suggested in
your letter of June 28,[374] and to advise our friends and the
securityholders generally to deposit their securities, without
requiring the assurances customary in such cases.
Very respectfully,
WM. P. CLYDE,
GEO. F. STONE,
WM. E. STRONG,
J. C. MABEN,
THOMAS F. RYAN.
This letter was accompanied by a letter from F. P. Olcott, president
of the Central Trust Company, pledging his support. Inasmuch as lack
of the assurances contained in this correspondence had alone prevented
Drexel, Morgan & Co. from undertaking the task proposed the previous
year, their prompt though conditional acceptance was not surprising.
A definitive engagement to attempt the work followed on April
12.[375] The enlistment of Drexel, Morgan & Co. in the reorganization
provoked general satisfaction. Mr. Hollins, of the Central of Georgia
reorganization committee, expressed his pleasure in having responsible
parties to deal with not connected with any past differences.[376] The
directors of the Richmond Terminal urged all classes of securityholders
to deposit, and the Clyde Committee was emphatic in its recommendation.
It was recognized that the situation was the most favorable which could
be hoped for. No group of Southern railroad financiers seemed capable
of producing a fair reorganization plan, and it was also probable
that no plan from such a source, however fair, would have received a
sympathetic welcome. Drexel, Morgan & Co., on the other hand, were both
capable and sure of a hearing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account