Railroads: Rates and RegulationsRipley, William Zebina
History
Railroads: Rates and Regulations
Ripley, William Zebina
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
of the property at all--that no logical distinction of expense even
as between passenger and freight traffic is possible. This being so,
how futile it is to expect to be able to set off the expenses due to
any particular portion either of freight or passenger service, and
especially to any individual shipment. It may oftentimes be possible
to determine the _extra_ cost due to individual shipments. This, of
course, mainly applies to what are called movement expenses. Thus the
haulage cost of a 2,000-ton grain train from Chicago to New York has
been estimated at $520. But how small a part this is of the total
cost, the preceding analysis must have made clear. In the Texas Cattle
Raisers' case, detailed analysis of the extra cost for the traffic
in cattle was presented.[49] The starting point in this attempt was
necessarily an allocation of freight and passenger expenditures, which,
if defective, would vitiate the entire subsequent calculation as to
costs. In this instance, it was the judgment of the Interstate Commerce
Commission in its final decision in 1908, that no such separation of
expenditures was possible as a basis for the determination of cost of
service.
FOOTNOTES:
[29] _Quarterly Journal of Economics_, XXII, 1908, p. 364 _et. seq._
[30] U. S. Statistics of Railways, 1908, p. 165 (and annually
thereafter), gives an outline of these expense accounts for all
railways over five hundred miles long.
[31] Treated in vol. II, chap. XV. Begins in U. S. Statistics of
Railways, 1909, p. 76.
[32] Changes in accounting rules in 1907 prevent its continuation
to date; but the data for 1909 under the new system are reproduced
alongside.
[33] U. S. Statistics of Railways, 1908, p. 165, and annually
thereafter gives data for all large roads.
[34] The sharp decline in traffic in 1911, especially after the
suspended advance of rates, as affecting maintenance expenditures per
mile of road, is shown as follows:
===================================
| 1911 | 1910
-------------------+-------+-------
Baltimore & Ohio | $5931 | $6336
Union Pacific | 3296 | 3363
Great Northern | 2375 | 2653
New York Central | 8681 | 8087
Northern Pacific | 2451 | 3413
Pennsylvania | 9088 | 9792
Multiplying these differences into thousands of miles of line shows the
great economy resulting.
[35] _Cf._ pp. 259 and 422, _infra_.
[36] The provision of plant and equipment to carry the "peak of the
load" is often a serious handicap.
[37] For an instance of detailed analysis of cost, the general
investigation of soft coal rates to the lakes in 1912 is highly
suggestive. Two-thirds of revenue went for operation and maintenance,
one-third for return upon plant. This was the first attempt to justify
an advance in rates for a large volume of traffic on the ground that it
did not contribute its proportionate share of earnings. 22 I.C.C. Rep.,
604.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account