“The total payments to the companies for the year 1854 were £392,600,
which it may be observed, exceeds by £83,000 the five per cent.
passenger tax for the same period. The above points are fully
discussed in an able report by Mr. Edward Page (Inspector General of
Mails), which will be found at page 45 of the appendix.
“To this report I would also refer for an investigation of the claims
frequently made by the railway companies for compensation on the
ground of
alleged injury by the book post. The report clearly shows: first,
that the service which is alleged to be an injury, is, in reality, a
benefit; second, that even if it were otherwise, the law relieving
newspapers from the compulsory stamp, must have had the effect of
transferring from the mail bags to the companies’ vans a weight
of newspapers many times exceeding that which the book post is
erroneously alleged to have withdrawn from the companies’ vans to the
mail bags.”
The foregoing is in the body of the report, what follows appears as a
foot-note.
“As nearly as it can be estimated it appears that, while the whole
number of book packets conveyed annually by the Post Office is
probably over stated at three millions, the number of newspapers[29]
passing through the post has decreased by about twenty-five millions,
or by more than eight times the number of all the book packets.
Besides this reduction in number, there has been a decrease in the
average weight of the newspapers sent through the post; and the
combined effect of these changes has been to reduce the total weight
of the newspapers by an amount more than nine times as great as the
total weight of all the book packets.”
There never has been anything to show, either at the time those
paragraphs were written, or subsequently, that cheap postage has tended
to increase railway traffic. We are therefore at a loss to understand
why such an assertion should be adduced as an argument. The same remark
applies to the connection attempted to be set up between the amount
paid by the Post Office for the transmission of mails through the
country, and the tax which railway companies pay to the Government as
their contribution to the fiscal burdens, unavoidably and of necessity
imposed upon industry by the State: and it must also be considered
strange that the Post Office should make a Postmaster-General’s Report
the medium of conveying to arbitrators its opinion as to the mode in
which they should arbitrate between it and the companies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account