Rank and Talent; A Novel, Vol. 1 (of 3)Scargill, William Pitt
General
Rank and Talent; A Novel, Vol. 1 (of 3)
Scargill, William Pitt
England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
Visiting in the country is what must be done; but there is some
difficulty in managing it well, and making it perfectly agreeable.
The entertainer must be entertaining, or the entertained will not
be entertained; and the entertained must endeavour to entertain
themselves, or their entertainer cannot entertain them. The Hon. Philip
Martindale was not the most dexterous hand at this kind of employment.
In fact, he felt himself not altogether master of his own house; and
the good people who were there seemed rather to be visiting the house
than its occupier. They did very well at dinner-time. Then there was
amusement for all, adapted to the meanest capacities. There was also
in the mornings for the gentlemen the pleasure of shooting; or, more
properly and accurately speaking, the pleasure of looking for something
to shoot at: for as Philip Martindale was not very popular at Brigland,
the poachers made a merit of plundering him with peculiar diligence.
It also happened that the gentlemen who were at the Abbey were none
of them very keen sportsmen. Sir Gilbert Sampson carried a gun, and
occasionally discharged it; sometimes successfully, and sometimes
unsuccessfully; and, in the latter case, Sir Andrew Featherstone
laughed at him, and said it was a sad waste of shot, for powder alone
would make noise enough to frighten the birds: and then he would ask
Philip Martindale if small shot were not very useful to clean bottles
withal.
As for old John Martindale, he was so perverse and obstinate that he
would scarcely ever join the party at the Abbey till dinner-time; and
then he would complain of late hours, and sit till midnight or later
grumbling at the foolish fashion of turning night into day. Several
mornings were wet, very wet: there was no getting out of doors, and the
Abbey was very ill-furnished with playthings. The young ladies could
draw. The Miss Featherstones were adepts especially in architectural
drawing. They sketched the interior of the principal apartments in the
Abbey; and talked very learnedly of Palladio and Vitruvius, and Sir
Christopher Wren and Mr. Nash, and others. They thought that Waterloo
Place was not equal to the Parthenon, and St. Paul’s Cathedral was not
equal to St. Peter’s. They talked about the building in which they were
then sitting, demonstrated that it was the most beautiful and best
proportioned building in the world, and then proceeded to show how much
more beautiful it might be made. As the party had nothing else to do,
they were very happy in listening to the architectural lectures of the
Miss Featherstones.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account