Jewish scholars -- France -- Troyes -- Biography; Rabbis -- France -- Troyes -- Biography; Rashi, 1040-1105
2. <H>Ozi vezimrat yah vayei li lishuah (Ayin Zayin Yod, Vav
Zayin Mem Resh Tav, Yod He, Vav Yod He Yod, Lamed Yod, Lamed
Yod Shin Vav Ayin He)</H>]. Onkelos translates: my strength
and my song of praise. He therefore explains <H>ohzi
(Ayin with qamats Zayin with dagesh and hiriq Yod)</H> as
<H>uzi (Ayin with qubuts, Zayin with dagesh and hiriq Yod)</H>
and <H>vezimrat (Vav Zayin Mem Resh Tav)</H> as <H>vezimrati
(Vav Zayin Mem Resh Tav Yod)</H> But I am astonished at the
vowelling of the first word, which is unique in Scriptures, if
an exception is made of the three passages in which the two
words are joined. In all other places it is provided with the
vowel "u", for example in Jer. xvi. 19 and Psalms lix. 10. In
general, when a word of two letters contains the vowel "o", if
it is lengthened by a third letter, and if the second letter
has no "sheva", the first takes an "u": <H>oz (Ayin with holam
Zayin)</H> makes <H>rok, uzi (Resh with sin dot Qof, Ayin with
qubuts Zayin with dagesh Yod</H> makes <H>jok, ruki (Het Qof,
Resh with qubuts Qof with dagesh and hiriq Yod)</H> makes
<H>ol, juki (Ayin with holam Lamed, Het with qubuts Qof with
dagesh and hiriq Yod</H> makes <H>kol ulo (Kaf with holam
Lamed, Ayin with qubuts Lamed with dagesh Vav)</H>[70] makes
<H>kulo (Kaf with qubuts Lamed with dagesh Vav)</H>, as in
Exodus xiv. 7. On the contrary, the three other passages,
namely, our passage, the one in Is. (xii. 2), and that in
Psalms (cxviii. 14), have <H>ozi (Ayin Zayin Yod)</H> vowelled
with a short "o"; moreover, these verses do not have
<H>vezimrati (Vav Zayin Mem Resh Tav Yod)</H> but <H>vezimrat
(Vav Zayin Mem Resh Tav)</H>, and all continue with <H>vayei
li lishuah (Vav Yod He Yod, Lamed Yod, Lamed Yod Shin Vav Ayin
He)</H>. And to give a full explanation of this verse, it is
in my opinion necessary to say that <H>ohzi (Ayin with qamats
Zayin with dagesh Yod)</H> is not equivalent to <H>uzi (Ayin
with qubuts Zayin with dagesh Yod</H> nor <H>vezimrat (Vav
Zayin Mem Resh Tav)</H> to <H>vezimrati (Vav Zayin Mem Resh
Tav Yod),</H> but that <H>ohzi (Ayin with qamats Zayin with
dagesh Yod)</H> is a substantive (without a possessive suffix,
but provided with a paragogic "yod"), as in Psalm cxxiii. 1,
Obadiah 3, Deut. xxxiii. 16. The eulogy (of the Hebrews)
therefore signifies: it is the strength and the vengeance of
God that have been my salvation. <H>vezimrat (Vav Zayin Mem
Resh Tav)</H> is thus in the construct with the word God,
exactly as in Judges v.23, Is. ix. 18, Eccl. iii. 18. As for
the word <H>vezimrat (Vav Zayin Mem Resh Tav)</H> it has the
meaning which the same root has in Lev. xxv. 4 ("thou shalt
not prune") and in Is. xxv. 5; that is to say, "to cut". The
meaning of our verse, then, is: "The strength and the
vengeance of our Lord have been our salvation." One must not
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account