Rasputin and the Russian RevolutionRadziwill, Catherine, Princess
History
Rasputin and the Russian Revolution
Radziwill, Catherine, Princess
Rasputin, Grigorii Efimovich, 1869-1916; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921
In the meanwhile the efforts of the Opposition party in the Duma had
succeeded to the extent of forcing Mr. Sturmer to resign as Prime
Minister; but he had influence enough to secure his appointment as High
Chancellor of the Imperial Court, one of the most important positions
in Russia. He did not fall into disgrace, but remained the power
behind the throne whose existence, though not officially recognised,
yet was everywhere acknowledged. He had not been dismissed, he had
simply gone away--a very different thing altogether in the realm of
the Czar. Though no longer a Minister, he was still a personage to be
considered as capable of an infinitude of good or of harm, according
as it might please him to exert his influence. His successor, Mr.
Trepoff, an upright and fairly able man, did not long retain the office
he had accepted much against his will. With him departed one of the
most popular Ministers Russia had known for a long time, Count Paul
Ignatieff, the able son of an able father. He had for something like
two years held the portfolio of Public Instruction to the general
satisfaction of the public and had come to the conclusion that it was
useless to go on fighting against dark powers which were getting the
upper hand everywhere.
The resignation of these two statesmen was preceded by one of the
most scandalous incidents in Russian modern history, the trial of
Mr. Manassevitsch-Maniuloff. This had been put off from day to day
for a considerable length of time until at last it became impossible
to secure further delay. The culprit had taken good care, as I have
already indicated, to put in safety documents of a most incriminating
nature, implicating many persons whom the authorities could not afford
to see mixed up in the dirty business connected with the numerous sins
of Mr. Sturmer’s private secretary. When the latter was questioned by
the examining magistrate in regard to that last transaction which had
brought him into court, he declared that he had acted in accordance
with the instructions which he had received from his chief and that it
was not he himself, but the Prime Minister who had received the money
which the bank that had lodged a complaint against him had been induced
to pay in order to be spared certain annoyances with which it had been
threatened. He had insisted upon this version of the affair and warned
the magistrate that his counsel would develop it in all the details
before the jury.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account