Rasputin and the Russian RevolutionRadziwill, Catherine, Princess
History
Rasputin and the Russian Revolution
Radziwill, Catherine, Princess
Rasputin, Grigorii Efimovich, 1869-1916; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921
His father had left to him a splendid inheritance, which he might
have kept intact with a little care, and very small trouble. Before
the Japanese war it might have been still possible for him to rule
his country autocratically, though not despotically; but after
Moukhden and Tschousima, and especially after the revolution which
followed upon these two catastrophes, and which would have been hardly
possible, had they not occurred, the thing became more difficult,
if not impossible, because the Russian nation had begun to wonder
at the causes that had brought about these terrible disasters, the
consequences of which had been the loss of Russian prestige in the Far
East, and even in Europe. It would, however, still have been possible
to save something out of the former form of government, if a serious
and honest appeal had been made to the nation to help to consolidate
its strength, and if an attempt had been made to modify it according
to the exigencies of the times and of the moment. But after the famous
day which saw rivers of blood flow in the streets of St. Petersburg,
and the wholesale slaying of thousands of innocent workmen, whose only
crime had consisted in wishing to lay their grievances before their
Czar, every attempt to keep up the old order of things was bound to
fail. Something else had to be tried to save the dynasty together with
the country, but not the granting of a so-called Constitution, which
it had been determined beforehand to leave a dead letter. If on the
occasion I have just referred to, Nicholas II. had found sufficient
courage to meet his people face to face, and to speak with them as
his great grandfather had done on an occasion far more critical even
than the ones which prevailed in 1905, it is likely that the divorce
which finally separated him from his subjects would never have taken
place. But he went to Tsarskoie Selo as soon as he heard there was
likely to be trouble in his capital, forgetting everything else but
his own personal safety, which, by the way, had never been seriously
threatened. He proved himself to be a coward, and cowardice is the
last thing which a nation forgives in those who rule it. The Czar lost
in consequence of his conduct every prestige he had left. And he also
lost the respect of Russia, owing to the shameless corruption which
established itself everywhere during his reign, when at last everything
under the sun could be bought or sold in the country, to begin with, a
Court appointment, and to end with, the highest functions in the State.
The Emperor was unable to refuse anything to those whom he liked, and
he never grasped this essential fact, that when one gives too easily
and without discernment, it inevitably follows that one also allows
people to take what perhaps one would never have granted, had one
thought about it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account