Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
General
Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
Patents
M. le Hardy de Beaulieu adds that he could cite numerous examples of
lands abandoned or sold at a nominal price by their owners, either
because they had exhausted and rendered them unproductive by an
unintelligent culture, or because they had not been able to withstand
the competition of more fertile soils, recently brought into cultivation
or brought nearer the common centre of consumption by a considerable
reduction in the expense of transport.
We do not contest this fact, of which the exactness may be verified any
day in the increase or diminution of the value of property induced by the
various changes brought about either in the grouping of the population,
in the modes of culture, or in the means of transport. There are,
however, few lands completely abandoned; to find examples, we should
probably have to go back to those fatal times when by force of conquest
proprietors were removed or all their means of culture and production
were suddenly seized.
But we do not see how this can help the argument of M. le Hardy de
Beaulieu. It has small relation, it seems to us, to the question of
property in inventions, that—perpetual by law, as long as labour
continues and renews it—landed property should sometimes come to an end
by occurrences or violence such as we have been speaking of.
However, to state all our thoughts on the subject of landed property,
we must confess (and here may be seen in all its clearness the radical
difference between placing under culture, or cropping land, and working
an idea), the vindication of property is found in the fact that land
can only be cultivated by one at a time, must be subject to one will,
and under one direction. It would be to my injury and the injury of the
entire community that Peter should be allowed to plant potatoes in the
field where Paul has already sowed wheat, or that James should open a
quarry where John has built a house, and so on.
As we have already said, the power of the lever, the laws of gravity,
those of the expansion of steam, the attraction of the magnet, the
caloric of coal, the facility of traction imparted by the wheel, the
optical properties of glass, &c., may be utilised to the great profit of
all, in a thousand different ways, by a thousand individuals at once,
without the efforts of any one being diminished, hindered, obstructed,
or lessened, as to their useful result, except by the beneficent laws of
competition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account