Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
General
Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
Patents
In 1856 an English chemist, of the name of Perkins, was seeking the
way to make artificial quinine. In the course of his experiments he
discovered in the laboratory of M. Hofmann the property residing in
aniline of producing a violet colour by the action of bi-chromate of
potass.
Perkins got a Patent for this discovery. The attention of the scientific
and industrial classes being called to this property of aniline, and to
the possibility of extracting from it divers colouring matters, several
French and other chemists and manufacturers got Patents for many more new
processes.
In 1858, Hofmann, continuing to study aniline, discovered the red colour.
He sent a memoir to our Académie des Sciences, in which he gave the exact
method to produce this magnificent crimson red.
Hofmann took no Patent; it seemed as if he wanted to present gratuitously
to tinctorial industry a new and beautiful produce.
Six months after, a manufacturer, who as early as 1857 had tried to
get patented in France the patented discovery of Perkins, sold to a
manufacturer of chemical produce a process copied from the discovery
of Hofmann, by which the red of aniline could be manufactured by the
reaction of the bi-chloride of tin. The Patent was granted, and the
produce manufactured. But very soon after, in France and abroad, more
advantageous and more scientific methods, preferable to the patented one,
were found.
All the French manufacturers who tried to use any of these new processes
were prosecuted and condemned for infringement on the right of the
patentee. It then followed that one kilogramme of red of aniline was sold
abroad for £12, and the monopolisers sold it for £40 in France.
This could not last, particularly after the treaty of commerce, by which
printed and dyed goods could be introduced. Manufacturers threatened to
give up work, and the patentee thought proper to reduce his prices.
But another result, no less fatal to French interests, soon followed.
The most intelligent manufacturers of colouring-stuffs, those who were
at the head of that branch of industry, and had concentrated in Paris,
Lyons, and Mulhouse the fabrication of the finest and most delicate dyes
for the home and foreign market, went to establish new factories across
the frontiers.
The existing Patent prevented them from satisfying the demands of their
customers abroad, who required some aniline colours, and they were
obliged to carry their industry to foreign parts.
The following is the list of the manufacturers who have founded new
establishments beyond the reach of the monopolising Patent:—
A. Schlumberger, of Mulhouse, new factory at Bâle (Switzerland); Jean
Feer, of Strasburg, new factory at Bâle; Peterson and Seikler, of Saint
Denis, new factory at Bâle; Poirrier and Chappal, of Paris, new factory
at Zurich; Monnet and Dury, of Lyons, new factory at Geneve.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account