Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
General
Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
Patents
“There are a great many Patents of this kind (practically
useless, but not appearing so on the face of them) taken out
for boilers of steam-engines, and boilers of steam-engines
admit of very enormous variety of shape and proportions,
without damaging their efficiency. The consequence is, that it
is hardly possible at this moment for a man having to scheme
a boiler for a new situation or new circumstances to avoid
putting his foot in so doing into a trap which somebody has
previously set for boilers.... Nearly the whole of the Patents
for the boilers of steam-engines at this moment are of no
practical value to inventors or to the public; but they are
continually getting every man who makes a boiler into a scrape
with some patentee, because almost every conceivable form of
boiler having been previously patented, and bit of a boiler,
one cannot make any sort of boiler without infringing some
man’s patent.”
He said precisely the same thing of screws. Then Mr. Platt, a well-known
machine-maker, said:—
“I think that there is scarcely a week, certainly not a month,
that passes but what we have a notice of some kind or other
of things that we have never heard of in any way, and do not
know of in the least, that we are infringing upon them; and
the difficulty is to get at any knowledge. We may be now
infringing, and may have been infringing for years, and a
person may have been watching us all the time, and when he
thinks that we have made a sufficient number, he may come down
upon us, and there is no record. If a thing is entirely new,
there is a record by getting a description; but what I mean
by a description is this—A very large number of Patents are
now taken out for what is termed a combination of known things
for the same purpose, and the descriptions of those Patents
are generally so bad that it is impossible to tell the parts
that are actually patented. It is only when you come into
court, or after making some compromise rather than go to that
expense, that you ascertain that fact, and very likely they
themselves in many cases do not know the parts that they have
actually claimed. It appears to me that, as to that question
of combination, the granting of Patents for things to do
precisely the same work in the same machine, with the addition,
perhaps, of a chain or a couple of bolts, or the form of the
lever changed, a straight lever made into a compound one; in
matters of that kind it has become a very serious question as
to conducting a large business.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account