Recollections and impressions of James A. McNeill WhistlerEddy, Arthur Jerome
General
Recollections and impressions of James A. McNeill Whistler
Eddy, Arthur Jerome
Painters -- United States -- 19th century -- Biography; Whistler, James McNeill, 1834-1903
The “portrait-painter” must dress his manikin in clothes that will
“paint,” for the manikin is worse than nothing for the picture. There
must be a gown of brilliant stuffs, and either a hat or the
hair-dresser,--who also has made and unmade portraits,--or there must be
a uniform, hunting-breeches, judge’s gown and wig, accordingly as the
manikin is woman or man; and it is the theatrical trappings that are
painted, and, incidentally thereto,--manikin.
* * * * *
Reynolds painted something like two thousand canvases. In 1758 one
hundred and fifty persons sat to him,--an average of three portraits a
week. He was as methodical as an automatic machine. Rose early,
breakfasted at nine, was in the studio at ten, worked by himself until
eleven, when his first sitter of the day would appear, to be succeeded
by another precisely one hour later, and so on, a sitter an hour, until
four o’clock, when the popular painter made himself ready for a plunge
in the social swirl.
Portraits produced under such conditions cannot be made more than
technically brilliant,--superficial likenesses of the great majority of
the sitters,--and are unworthy the painter’s art.
After a brief study of their careers, and without seeing a portrait by
either, one would be warranted in looking for a masterpiece among
Gainsborough’s two hundred and twenty portraits rather than among the
two thousand canvases of Reynolds.
Great facility of execution is not necessarily a condemnatory feature
of a man’s art, but it is a dangerous feature, and with most men it is a
fatal feature.
The hand of the master must be entirely subservient to the brain. No
obstacle should intervene between the inspiration and its complete
expression, but the hand must not force the imagination; and it is true
that command of technic--mere digital dexterity--does lead the
performer, whether painter or musician, to speak when he has nothing to
say.
Happily for the reputation of Reynolds, he painted now and then a
portrait in which he took more interest, and these have some--possibly
not many--of the qualities that live. For the most part his reputation
rests on mere volume of brilliant and high-grade work,--very much as one
factory has a greater reputation than another. And he did more than any
man who ever lived to reduce “portrait-painting” to a trade, a
mechanical pursuit.
In the modern sense of the phrase, he was one of the greatest of
“portrait-painters;” certainly the most “successful”--again in the
modern sense--the world has known, of talent supreme, in genius wanting.
* * * * *
But there are portraits and portraits,--to illustrate:
There are portraits.
There are portraits that are also pictures.
There are pictures that are also portraits.
There are pictures.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account