Louisiana -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Louisiana; Thesis (Ph. D.)
I cannot pass from this subject to other details, in justice, without
calling your attention to the general and peaceable acquiescence of
our people in the results of the reconstruction policy of the general
government. Their acceptance of it as a finality has been much more
satisfactory in Louisiana than in any other state in the South.[301]
While urging the encouragement of public improvements, he warned
the Assembly against certain schemes of plunder “which are already
organizing and will continue to be organized and presented to you
for votes,” and insisted that the commonwealth’s state of bonded
indebtedness must preclude any further appropriations as subsidy.
Adequate penalty for bribery,[302] which had, he acknowledged, become
a “crying evil,” amendments to the public land laws, the police jury
system, the restoration of the old capitol at Baton Rouge, and a larger
measure of home rule for New Orleans are subjects which appear in his
message for the first time.[303] Although defending the legislation
of the previous session, he recommended with studied vagueness of
expression the modification of the election and registration laws:
The violent rancor of that period (1868) having now given place to
a more liberal and just acknowledgment of the true relations of all
our citizens, I commend to your consideration the modification of the
registration and election laws to an extent, that, while securing
the inalienable rights of all, will make the usage under them less
irksome and exacting to the few.[304]
Together with his message he returned without his approval ten bills
to the Senate,[305] and three to the House. The veto power was very
freely used by Governor Warmoth. Up to January 1, 1871, he had vetoed
thirty-nine bills[306] and suffered others to become law without his
approval by lapse of the constitutional time limit, because they were
passed by such a majority as to have made “his veto a useless bit of
friction.”[307] His courage in boldly vetoing some measures very close
to the hearts of his legislators should not pass unnoted, nor the
strength of his influence, for only five, up to this time, were able to
muster the requisite two-thirds majority in the face of his opposition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account