Records, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord FisherFisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
History
Records, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Fisher
Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
Admirals -- Great Britain -- Biography; Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron, 1841-1920; Great Britain. Royal Navy
Moreover, under numerous circumstances can a submarine allow
a merchant ship to pass unmolested? Harmless trader in
appearance, in reality she may be one of the numerous fleet
auxiliaries, a mine-layer, or carrying troops, and so on. Can
the submarine come to the surface to inquire and lose all
chance of attack if the vessel should prove to be faster than
she is? The apparent merchant ship may also be armed. In this
light, indeed, the recent arming of our British merchantmen is
unfortunate, for it gives the hostile submarine an excellent
excuse (if she needs one) for sinking them; namely, that of
self-defence against the guns of the merchant ship.
What can be the answer to all the foregoing but that (barbarous
and inhuman as, we again repeat, it may appear), if the
submarine is used at all against commerce, she must sink her
captures?
For the prevention of submarines preying on our commerce, it is
above all necessary that merchant shipping should take every
advantage of our favourable geographical position, and that we
should make the Straits of Dover as difficult as we possibly
can.
It is not proposed here to enter into the technical details of
such arrangements; but even after every conceivable means has
been taken, it must be conceded that there is at least a chance
of submarines passing safely through; while at night, or in
thick weather, it is probable that they would not fail to pass
in safety.
I conclude with some details of British Submarines before and during
the War:--
I. When I left the Admiralty in January, 1910:
Submarines ready for fighting 61
Building and on order 13
II. When I returned to the Admiralty, in October, 1914, as First Sea
Lord:
Submarines fit for fighting 53
Building and on order 21
But of these 21, only 5 were any good!
2 were paid off as useless.
3 sold to the Italians, not of use to us.
4 sold to the French, not of use to us.
7 of unsatisfactory design.
--
16 leaving only 5 of oversea modern (“E”) Type.
--
Nominally, there were 77 Submarines when I returned in October, 1914,
but out of these 24 were useless, or had gone to the Antipodes, as
follows:
2 to Australia.
3 to Hong Kong.
1 sold to Italy useless.
8 “A” Class scrapped, 10 years old.
10 “B” Class scrapped, 9 years old.
--
24
77 - 24 = 53 total Submarines fit for Service when I returned in
October, 1914.
There were 61 Submarines efficient when I left the Admiralty in
January, 1910.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account