Records, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord FisherFisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
History
Records, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Fisher
Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
Admirals -- Great Britain -- Biography; Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron, 1841-1920; Great Britain. Royal Navy
It needs not a Soldier to realise that had the British Expeditionary
Force of 160,000 men been landed at Antwerp by the British Fleet in
August, 1914 (instead of its occupying a small sector in the midst of
the French Army in France), that the War would certainly have ended
in 1915. This, in conjunction with the seizure of the Baltic by the
British Fleet and the landing of a Russian Army on the Pomeranian Coast
would have smashed the Germans. All this was foreshadowed in 1908, and
the German Emperor kindly gave me the credit as the Instigator of the
Idea so deadly to Germany.
THE “MONSTROUS” CRUISERS SO DERIDED IN PARLIAMENT
_Note._--When I came to the Admiralty as First Sea Lord in
October, 1914--three months after the War had begun--I obtained
the very cordial concurrence and help of Mr. Churchill and Mr.
Lloyd George (Chancellor of the Exchequer) in an unparalleled
building programme of 612 vessels of types necessary for a
Big Offensive in Northern Waters (_the decisive theatre of
the War_). Coal-burning Battleships then under construction
were re-designed to burn oil, with great increase of their
efficiency and speed, and the last two of these eight
Battleships were scrapped (the “Renown” and “Repulse”), and,
together with three new vessels--the “Courageous,” “Glorious,”
and “Furious”--were arranged to have immense speed, heavy guns
and unprecedented light draught of water, thus enabling them
to fulfil the very work described in this letter below of
absolutely disposing of hostile light cruisers and following
them into shallow waters. They were also meant for service in
the Baltic.
Ever since their production became known, Naval critics in both
Houses of Parliament (quite ignorant of new Naval strategical
and tactical requirements) have consistently crabbed these
new mighty Engines of War as the emanations of a sick brain,
“_senile and autocratic_!” Hence the value of the following
letter from an eyewitness of high rank:
_To Lord Fisher from a Naval Officer_
_December 12th, 1917._
DEAR LORD FISHER,
In the late action in the Heligoland Bight the only heavy
ships which could get up with the enemy were the “Repulse,”
“Courageous” and “Glorious” (the “Renown” and “Furious” were
elsewhere).[14] They very nearly brought off an important
“coup!” Without them our light cruisers would not have had a
“look in,” or perhaps would have been “done in!” When public
speakers desired to decry the work of the Board of which you
were a Member in 1914 and 1915, and particularly that part of
the work for which you were so personally responsible as this
new type of heavy ship, no condemnation was too heavy to heap
on your design!
It is a pleasure to me, therefore, to be able to let you know
that they have fully justified your anticipation of their
success.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account