Records, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord FisherFisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
History
Records, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Fisher
Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
Admirals -- Great Britain -- Biography; Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron, 1841-1920; Great Britain. Royal Navy
In recent years, however, the familiarity with Ocean routes that has
been attained; the greatly extended area of coast surveys, and the
admirable system of lights and beacons established throughout the
navigational zones of the world, have in the course of years caused the
work of the Observatories to become of less importance to practical
navigation, and more a matter of scientific research. The photographic
mapping of the heavens, by which stars invisible to the naked eye are
discovered, is not a necessity to navigation, nor to the Naval Service.
At the present time, therefore, it may be said that the only work
done by the Observatories which is directly useful to the Navy, is
the testing and storing of chronometers; observing the astronomical
changes connected with the heavenly bodies for the purpose of obtaining
data for the correction of the Nautical Almanack; supplying accurate
time for time signals and meridian distance work, and taking magnetic
observations.
This sphere of usefulness is not of advantage to the Navy alone.
The Mercantile Marine derives equal benefit from the work of the
Observatories. Greenwich time is indispensable to Railway Companies to
enable them to work their complicated systems with accuracy, and it is
equally indispensable to the Postal Authorities for the proper working
of every post and telegraph office in the Kingdom. Although the staff
of the Observatories is very largely occupied upon services of this
public character, neither the Board of Trade, nor Lloyd’s, nor the
various Mercantile Shipping Associations, nor the Railway Companies,
nor the General Post Office, have made any contribution towards their
cost, while, on the other hand, in one case, that of the Post Office,
the Admiralty is charged with a heavy annual payment for postal and
telegraphic communications. The London Water Companies are greatly
assisted by the Greenwich rainfall observations, but they pay nothing
for them, neither do they supply the Admiralty with water gratuitously.
It is fitting that the British Empire should possess a National
Observatory, but it is not equitable that Naval funds should bear the
whole expense.
When criticism is directed against the magnitude of the Navy Estimates,
it rarely happens that the critic takes the trouble to ascertain of
what Items the Votes are made up; on the other hand, money voted for
the Royal Observatories is passed by the House without much question,
because it happens to form part of Estimates which are of such great
magnitude.
The present procedure tends therefore to obscure the actual sum total
of the Navy Estimates, and at the same time it prevents the application
to the Royal Observatories of the same Parliamentary criticism which is
applied to the Civil Service Estimates.
CHAPTER IX
NAVAL PROBLEMS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account