Records, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord FisherFisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
History
Records, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Fisher
Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
Admirals -- Great Britain -- Biography; Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron, 1841-1920; Great Britain. Royal Navy
Naval Officers, as a class, are conservative and dislike change, and
as a rule are prepared to resist it. The manner in which the recent
changes have been received, root and branch and sweeping as they were,
shows, as nothing else can, the necessity for reforms. Compare the
insignificant agitation (which has, however, now entirely collapsed),
in the Navy over the vast and drastic reforms of the last two years
with the agitation in the Army over the trifling matter of getting rid
of two battalions of Guards!
So let us be grateful--adequately grateful--to the officers and men of
the Navy for their splendid loyalty during the introduction of reforms,
some of which have hit them very hard, notably the sudden bringing
home and paying off of the large number of vessels that were wiped
out of the Navy as not being up to the required standard of fighting
efficiency. And there was also the redistribution of the Fleet, which
deprived many officers of advantageous appointments and seriously
disturbed domestic arrangements.
But the fact is that the Navy sees the fighting advantages we have
gained, and so has loyally responded to the demands on its sense of
duty.
As an excellent writer in the “North American Review” for June so aptly
expresses it, the Navy saw that it was steam-manship that was wanted,
and so, as a body, they welcomed the new scheme of training both of
officers and men. They saw also that to have every vessel of the Navy,
large and small, mobilised and efficient to fight within three hours
in the dead of night, as practically exemplified in the recent Grand
Manœuvres, is a result which justifies all the drastic measures of the
Board of Admiralty.
The Navy also recognises the incomparable fighting advantages of the
new era in giving us an unparalleled gunnery efficiency, as exemplified
in the fact that before that new era there were 2,000 more misses than
hits in the annual gunlayers’ competition, while in the year after
there were 2,000 more hits than misses! In the new order the best ship
is the one that can catch the enemy soonest, and hit him hardest and
oftenest; under the old system these considerations were certainly not
the primary ones.
The Navy sees also that, while the fighting efficiency of the British
Fleet and its instant readiness for war has become a household
word amongst the Admiralties of the world, at the same time vast
economies--to be reckoned in many millions--have been effected; for
instance, our harbours, docks, and basins are ridded of obsolete
vessels and thus made adequate for the accommodation of our fighting
fleet, for which there was no room previously, and no less a sum than
13 millions sterling was at one time contemplated as necessary to give
the required accommodation. The whole of that 13 millions in proposed
works has been cancelled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account