But now arises a question which has sometimes occasioned difficulty in
thoughtful minds. A complete forgiveness is the starting-point of the
Christian’s life; and accordingly this forgiveness of sin is described as
a complete and present privilege, so we read, ‘In whom,’ _i.e._, in
Christ the Beloved One, ‘we have redemption through his blood, the
forgiveness of sins.’ The apostle speaks of it there as something of
which we are now in the present enjoyment, for he says, ‘We have it.’ It
is ours now. But yet in other passages, such as the Lord’s Prayer, the
children of God are taught to ask for it with as much regularity as for
their daily bread. How is it, then, that we are told to ask for that we
have already? Why do we pray the Lord’s Prayer every day when we already
have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins? It is a very
natural question, and I cannot be surprised if persons feel the
difficulty. But I believe that if we look carefully at the real work of
redemption it will throw great light on the subject. We shall find if we
do so that there are two kinds of forgiveness described in the word of
God, the one the immediate, and the other the consequent, result of
redemption. There is judicial forgiveness as the foundation, and
parental forgiveness as the consequence: the two being closely connected
with each other, and both resulting from redemption. Let us study them
separately.
* * * * *
I. Judicial forgiveness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account