Reflections on the death of a porcupine and other essaysLawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
Philosophy
Reflections on the death of a porcupine and other essays
Lawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
English essays -- 20th century
But even within the species, there is a difference. The nightingale is
higher, purer, even more alive, more subtly, delicately alive, than the
sparrow. And the parrot is more highly developed, or more alive, than
the pigeon.
Among men, the difference in _being_ is infinite. And it is a difference
in degree as well as in kind. One man _is_, in himself, more, more
alive, more of a man, than another. One man has greater being than
another, a purer manhood, a more vivid livingness. The difference is
infinite.
And, seeing that the inferiors are vastly more numerous than the
superiors, when Jesus came, the inferiors, who are no means the meek
that they _should_ be, set out to inherit the earth.
Jesus, in a world of arrogant Pharisees and egoistic Romans, thought
that purity and poverty were one. It was a fatal mistake. Purity is
often enough poor. But poverty is only too rarely pure. Poverty too
often is only the result of _natural_ poorness, poorness in courage,
poorness in living vitality, poorness in manhood: poor life, poor
character. Now the poor in life are the most impure, the most easily
degenerate.
But the few men rich in life and pure in heart read purity into poverty,
and Christianity started. “Charity suffereth long, and is kind. Charity
envieth not. Charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up.”
They are the words of a noble manhood.
There happened what was bound to happen: the men with pure hearts left
the scramble for money and power to the impure.
Still the great appeal: “The Kingdom of Heaven is within you,” acted
powerfully on the hearts of the poor, who were still full of life. The
rich were more active, but less alive. The poor still wanted, most of
all, the Kingdom of Heaven.
Until the pure men began to mistrust the figurative Kingdom of Heaven:
“Not much Kingdom of Heaven for a hungry man,” they said.
This was a mistake, and a fall into impurity. For even if I die of
hunger, the Kingdom of Heaven is within me, and I am within it, if I
truly choose.
But once the pure man said this: “_Not much Kingdom of Heaven for a
hungry man_,” the Soul began to die out of men.
By the old creed, every soul was equal in the sight of God. By the new
creed, every body should be equal in the sight of men. And being equal
meant, having equal possessions. And possessions were reckoned in terms
of money.
So that money became the one absolute. And man figures as a
money-possessor and a money-getter. The absolute, the God, the Kingdom
of Heaven itself, became money; hard, hard cash. “The Kingdom of Heaven
is within you” now means “The money is in your pocket.” “Then shall thy
peace be as a river” now means “Then shall thy investments bring thee a
safe and ample income.”
“_L’homme est né libre_” means “He is born without a son.” “_Et on le
trouve partout enchainé_” means “He wears breeches, and must fill his
pockets.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account