Reflections on the painting and sculpture of the Greeks : $b with instructions for the connoisseur, and an essay on grace in works of artWinckelmann, Johann Joachim
Philosophy
Reflections on the painting and sculpture of the Greeks : $b with instructions for the connoisseur, and an essay on grace in works of art
Winckelmann, Johann Joachim
Aesthetics -- Early works to 1800; Art -- Philosophy; Art, Greek
Let Raphael be imitated in his best manner, and when in his prime; those
works want no apology: it was to no purpose to produce Parrhasius and
Zeuxis in order to excuse Him, and the Dutch proportions! ’Tis true, the
passage of Pliny[176], which you quote concerning Parrhasius, meets
commonly with the same interpretation, viz. _that, shunning corpulency
he fell into leanness_[177]. But supposing Pliny to have understood what
he wrote, we must clear him of contradicting himself. A little before
he allowed to Parrhasius a superiority in the contour, or in his own
words, _in the outlines_; and in the passage before us, _Parrhasius,
compared with himself, seems, in POINT OF THE MIDDLE PARTS, to fall short
of himself_. The question is, what he means by middle parts? Perhaps
the parts bordering on the outlines: but is not the designer obliged to
know every possible attitude of the frame, every change of its contour?
If so, it is ridiculous to give this explication to our passage: for
the middle parts of a full face are the outlines of its profile, and
so on. Consequently, there is no such thing as middle parts to be met
with by a designer: the idea of a painter, well-skilled in the contour
of the outlines, but ignorant of their contents, is an absurd one.
Parrhasius perhaps either wanted skill in the Chiaroscuro, or Keeping
in the disposition of his limbs, and this seems the only explication,
which the words of Pliny can reasonably admit of. Unless we choose to
make him another La Fage, who, though a celebrated designer, never
failed spoiling his contours with his colours. Or, perhaps, to indulge
another conjecture, Parrhasius smoothed the outlines of his contour,
where it bordered on the grounds, in order to avoid being rough; a fault
committed, as it seems, by his contemporaries, and by the artists who
flourished in the beginning of the sixteenth century, who circumscribed
their figures, as it were with a knife; but those smooth contours wanted
the support of keeping, and of masses gradually rising or sinking, in
order to become round, and to strike the eye: by failing in which,
his figures got an air of flatness; and thus Parrhasius fell short of
himself, without being either too corpulent or too lean.
We cannot conclude, from the Homeric shape which Zeuxis gave his female
figures, that he raised them, like Rubens, into flesh-hills. There is
some reason to believe, from the education of the Spartan ladies, that
they had something of a masculine vigour, though they were the chief
beauties of Greece; and such a one is the Helena of Theocritus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account