Reflections on the Rise and Fall of the Ancient Republicks: Adapted to the Present State of Great BritainMontagu, Edward Wortley
Philosophy
Reflections on the Rise and Fall of the Ancient Republicks: Adapted to the Present State of Great Britain
Montagu, Edward Wortley
History, Ancient -- Philosophy; Republics
[308] Sed pietate ac religione, atque hac una sapientia, quod
deorum immortalium numine omnia regi gubernarique perspeximus,
omnes gentes nationesque superavimus. Cic. de. Harus. resp. p.
189.
[309] Quis est qui——cum deos esse intellexerit, non intelligat
eorum numine hoc tantum imperium esse natum, et auctum et
retentum. Ibid. p. 188.
[310] Cari sunt parentes, cari liberi, propinqui et familiares:
sed omnes omnium caritates patria una complexa est. Cic. de
Offic.
[311] Pro qua patria, mori, et cui nos totos dedere, et in qua
nostra omnia ponere, et quasi consecrare debemus. Cic. de Leg.
[312] That the fundamental principles of the stoicks tended to
atheism I readily grant: but as the real philosophers of that
sect inculcated a thorough contempt for what are called the
good things of this life, and were extremely austere in their
morals; their doctrines seem to have had a very different
influence upon the manners of the people wherever they were
received, from those of the Epicureans.—Brutus and Cato the
inflexible champions of liberty, and almost the only virtuous
characters in that corrupt period, were rigid stoicks.—Julius
Cæsar who subverted the constitution of his country, was a
thorough Epicurean, both in principle and practice. His
principles we plainly see in his sophistical speech in Sallust,
where he urges the total extinction of our being at death, as
an argument for sparing the lives of Cataline’s accomplices.
For he audaciously affirms to the senate:—“that death as a
punishment was so far from being an evil; that it released us
from all our sorrows, when labouring under distress and misery:
that it put a final period to all the evils of this life,
beyond which there was no longer room either for grief or joy.”
Thus as the learned Dr. Warburton justly remarks, “he took
occasion, with a licentiousness until then unknown to that
august assembly, to explain and enforce the avowed principles
of Epicurus (of whose sect he was) concerning _the mortality of
the soul_.” Divine legation part 2d. pages, 111, 112, last
edition. That his manners were notoriously infamous we may
learn from the history of his life in Suetonius, where he is
termed _the husband of every woman, and the wife of every man_.
Omnium mulierum virum, et omnium virorum mulierem. Sueton. in
vit. Jul. Cæsar, c. 52. ad finem.
[313] I here mean the tenets of the _Epicurean atheists_ as
they are termed by the very learned Mr. Baxter in his treatise
of the immortality of the soul; where he has confuted them at
large in the first volume of that admirable work.
Inquiry into the nature of the human soul. Vol. 1. p. 355.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account