[39] There are no facts that show that this statement is not entirely
imaginary. T. H. M.
[40] The _italics_ are, of course, my own. T. H. M.
[41] _Fundulus heteroclitus_, _Stenopus chrysops_, _Decapterus
macrella_, _Menticirrhus macrella_, _Carassius auratus_, _Phoxinus
funduloides_, _Noturus sp._, and a few others.
[42] See Newport and Scudder.
[43] Brindley, ’97.
[44] Lepelletur, _Nouveau Bulletin de la Société philomatique_, 1813,
Tome III, page 254; Heineken, _Zool. Journal_, 1828, Vol. IV, page 284
(also for insects, _ibid._, page 294); Müller, _Manual de Physiol._,
Tome I, page 30; Wagner, W., _Bull. Soc. Imp. Natural._, Moscow, ’87.
[45] The Sarasins have described several cases in _Linckia multiformis_
in which an old arm has one or more new arms arising from it. In one
case (copied in our Fig. 38, _G_), four rays arise from the end of one
arm, producing the appearance of a new starfish. In fact the Sarasins
interpret the result in this way, although they state that there is no
madreporite on the upper surface, and they did not determine whether a
mouth is formed at the convergence of the rays, because they did not
wish to destroy so unique a specimen--even to find out the meaning of
it. There seems to me little probability that the new structure is a
starfish, but the old arm has been so injured that it has produced a
number of new arms.
[46] For a review of the literature see Brindley, ’98.
[47] I do not know whether this animal was kept long enough to make it
certain that the legs do not regenerate.
[48] A statement to the contrary quoted in Darwin’s _Animals and Plants
under Domestication_ is doubted by Darwin himself.
[49] The stork and the fighting cocks.
[50] See Darwin, _loc. cit._
[51] The more generally accepted results are given in Virchow’s
_Cellular Pathology_ and in Ziegler’s _Pathological Anatomy_. An
excellent review of the subject down to 1895 is given in a summary by
Ludwig Aschoff in the _Ergebnisse d. allgem. patholog. Morphol. und
Physiologie_, 1895, “Regeneration und Hypertrophie,” in which there are
two hundred and eighteen references to the literature.
[52] Nothnagel gives a review of the subject down to 1886 in an
article entitled “_Über Anpassung und Ausgleichung bei pathologischen
Zuständen. Zeitsch. f. klinische Medicin._” 1886. Vols. X and XI.
[53] Not, however, from the same litter.
[54] _Internat. Beiträge zu wissensch. Medicin. Festschrift für R.
Virchow_, Vol. II, 1891.
[55] _Vorlesungen über allgemeine, Pathologie_, Vol. I, 1882.
[56] _Handbuch._
[57] _Handbuch d. allgem. Pathologie_, 1879.
[58] _Allgemeine Pathologie_, Vol. II, 1889.
[59] _Über Endothelwucherungen in Arterien. Beitr. z. pathol. Anat._,
Vol. VIII, 1890.
[60] Haeckel (1870) first showed, in another medusa, that pieces
produce new medusæ.
[61] In rodents, however, the incisors continue to grow throughout the
life of the animal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account