"Indeed, contrasted with the teachings of modern times, the
comprehensiveness and sufficiency of the rules and cardinal points
comprised in the Hebrew Sanitary Code, primitive in time but not in
practice; ancient, but not antiquated and obsolete; comprising a
treasure of infallible truth, which is the admiration of all
experts; and altogether so remarkable as to be comparable to, if
indeed they do not surpass both in literary style and professional
excellence, extracts from the best modern works on hygiene. So that
savants, notwithstanding their increased anatomical and
physiological knowledge, the accumulation of ages and the result of
modern enlightenment and civilization, bringing with them vastly
improved facilities for medical study, professional experience in
hospitals and communities, may still quote his model work with
approval; sit with advantage at the feet of the Jewish sage; and
learn in language as concise and forcible as that of the best modern
thinkers, not only the great base facts, but even many of the less
important minutiae of the art and science which they {308} study; if
they would not continue to despise this authority because he is a
Hebrew; ignore his work because it is Asiatic; slight the book in
which it is found because it is not a rare, costly and abstruse
volume; spurn instruction on a scientific subject because it comes
from a Biblical source; and neglect the ready-made and divinely
inspired code because it is ancient and a non-professional
publication."
The question of the place that this health legislation of the Bible
has in medical history is worth noting, for it makes very clear that
it was no mere human development but something divine. Doctor Rattray
said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account