Reminiscences of Sixty Years in Public Affairs, Vol. 2Boutwell, George S. (George Sewall)
History
Reminiscences of Sixty Years in Public Affairs, Vol. 2
Boutwell, George S. (George Sewall)
Boutwell, George S. (George Sewall), 1818-1905; United States -- Politics and government
It was a singular coincidence, and a coincidence probably not due to
natural causes, that some five per cent bonds, having fifteen years to
run, should be at par, and that other five per cent bonds that might
run thirty years should fall below par in the same market. In the
three months from August to December, these ten-forties were quoted
as low as ninety-seven, or even for a time at ninety-six. Cooke became
anxious, if not alarmed, lest the rate should fall below ninety-five,
and consequently lest the subscribers should refuse to meet their
obligations. Early on the morning of the first Monday in December, I
received the information that the bonds were taken as soon as the
offices were open. I may mention in passing that Cooke & Co. paid for
the bonds as they were delivered, either in coin or in five-twenty
bonds.
As bonds were taken, and as payments were made, a difficulty appeared
which had been anticipated, but not in its fullness. The proceeds from
the sales of the five per cent bonds were pledged to the redemption of
the six per cent five-twenty bonds, reckoned at their par value.
It was provided by the statute that whenever five-twenty bonds were
called, a notice of ninety days should be given, when interest would
cease. Thus it happened that whenever a bond was called it was worth
par and interest to the end of the ninety days. Of the called bonds
some were in America, and the owners did not choose to present them in
London in exchange for five per cent bonds, nor for coin. Hence it
happened that the total proceeds of the five per cent bonds, about
twenty million dollars were paid in gold coin by Cooke & Co. This
coin was deposited in the Bank of England, but upon such terms as
were imposed by the governors:
(1) The deposits must be made in the name of William A. Richardson.
This was done, but a statement was made by Judge Richardson that the
deposit was the property of the United States.
(2) The gold was not to be taken out of the country. This stipulation
was in the line of our policy, which was to invest the entire sum in
five-twenty bonds, whenever they could be bought at par. The
opportunity came in a manner that was not anticipated. The documents
referred to are of historical value, and they are therefore inserted
as follows:
_(a)_ A declaration of trust by William A. Richardson, Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury, dated at London, December 28, 1871.
_(b)_ Letter of William A. Richardson, Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury, to John P. Bigelow, Chief of the Loan Division of the
Treasury, dated also at London, December 28, 1871.
_(c)_ Letter of George Forbes, Chief Cashier of the Bank of England,
to Judge Richardson, dated January 4, 1872.
_(d)_ Letter of Judge Richardson to George Lyall, Governor of the
Bank of England, dated January 15, 1872.
_(e)_ Reply to the same by George Forbes, Chief Cashier, dated
January 17, 1872.
_(f)_ William A. Richardson's report of January 25, 1872.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account