Report of the Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877: Read in the Senate and House of Representatives May 23, 1878Pennsylvania. General Assembly. Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877
History
Report of the Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877: Read in the Senate and House of Representatives May 23, 1878
Pennsylvania. General Assembly. Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877
A. No; I cannot say that I did, because it was a secondary
consideration in regard to those men. The information was interfering
with railroad employés, and we considered it a light matter towards
what was going on at Twenty-eighth street--the riotous proceedings. We
were kept busy that day and night trying to keep order.
Q. Those men were all participating in the riot as leaders when you
first went out there?
A. I do not know that of my own knowledge, but I, of course, inferred
it from the fact of the information made against them.
Q. Did you know any of the ten or twelve men that stood around, trying
to prevent the arrest of McCall?
A. None of them tried to prevent the arrest of McCall. I knew some of
them by face and a few by name.
Q. Were any of those men's names included in those warrants?
A. I believe they were, but I did not have those warrants at the time.
Q. You did not get them until that evening or the next morning?
A. I think it was the next morning.
Q. Then you did not go up to arrest them when you got the warrants?
A. Not immediately. It was considered a matter of judgment at the
office by the mayor, and, of course, I was under his instructions.
Q. You followed the mayor's instructions?
A. Not specially his instructions, but chief O'Mara's instructions. I
considered it would be easier to serve them afterwards than at the
present time.
By Mr. Engelbert:
Q. When you summoned those men to go out, you did not provide them with
maces and equipments as you usually do?
A. The police force of this city provide everything for themselves. If
they want to carry a pistol, they must provide it. Our maces we buy,
and our clothes we buy. The city supplies nothing. At one time the city
supplied those things, but now we have got to supply all those things
ourselves. We did not think it would be necessary to have them armed at
that time.
Q. At the time of a row, if the men are armed, it is all right, and if
they are not armed, it is all right, too?
A. It was a sudden summons, and nobody understood the extent of it. Of
course, the gentleman who summoned us, said he did not anticipate any
serious trouble at all; that he thought that our official appearance
would be sufficient; that the presence of the officers there would be
all that was necessary.
Q. But you, as an officer, did not exactly believe in official
appearance, without something to knock down with in case of a row?
A. In case of a riot we ought to be provided with arms; but there was
no riot at that time, nor did we anticipate any.
[A paper exhibited to witness.]
Q. State whether this is the information made upon which the warrants
were issued?
A. I never saw it.
Q. What did you do with the warrants?
A. They are still in the office.
Q. You returned them to the mayor?
A. No; they are still in the closet at the office. I think they are
there yet. I may have destroyed them.
Q. Do you know the date of the warrants?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account