Report of the Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877: Read in the Senate and House of Representatives May 23, 1878Pennsylvania. General Assembly. Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877
History
Report of the Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877: Read in the Senate and House of Representatives May 23, 1878
Pennsylvania. General Assembly. Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877
A. Since then I know of one party that was a leader in it. But I do not
know the others.
Q. Were any policemen in the vicinity at the time?
A. No; at that time there were no police on duty. They didn't go on
duty until eight o'clock.
Q. Were any policemen on duty throughout the city during the day,
Friday?
A. No.
Q. During the day, Saturday, throughout the city, I mean?
A. No.
Q. They were not on duty until eight o'clock, Saturday night?
A. No.
Q. Then these stores were broken open before eight o'clock?
A. Yes; that is, the first two.
Q. When there were no policemen on duty?
A. Yes.
Q. When did the mayor put on any day force, or was there any day force
on Sunday?
A. On Saturday night I put a notice, by the order of the mayor, into
two of the Sunday papers, to have all those ex-policemen report at
eleven o'clock on Sunday, but got very few reports.
Q. How many reports did you get?
A. I do not remember now--not probably over fifteen or twenty reported
in time.
Q. Were they placed on duty during Sunday?
A. Yes.
Q. Were there any policemen on duty throughout the city on Sunday?
A. Yes.
Q. How many?
A. Well, the third district had some of the south side police on duty
on Sunday night, in the vicinity of Twenty-eighth street, and the
police there I brought in on Sunday morning, and got their breakfasts,
and sent them out again. Some of them strayed off, of course.
Q. As chief of police, can you not give us the number of policemen on
duty during Sunday, in the whole city?
A. I do not think there were more than eighty. That is, we got more men
on as it grew later in the day.
Q. This notice you placed in the papers was merely a request for the
discharged police force to report at eleven o'clock?
A. Yes; I had the orders, and I think the mayor had consulted with the
committee of safety, or some one who assured him they would be
responsible for the pay of the police, and would see that the police
stayed on.
Q. What time did you get that notice into the papers?
A. It was given to the papers on Saturday night.
Q. Was it published in the evening editions?
A. It was published in the _Globe_ and _Leader_ of Sunday morning.
Q. By whom was the notice signed?
A. By myself.
Q. As chief of police?
A. Yes.
Q. You say you got very few reports?
A. Very few; that is, at eleven o'clock.
Q. During Sunday night how many police did you have on duty?
A. I had all the old force, and I expect, perhaps, about forty or fifty
of the discharged men.
Q. That would make about one hundred and forty or one hundred and fifty
men during Sunday night?
A. Yes.
Q. How many did you have on duty during the day--Monday?
A. Well, those policemen came reporting in one after another from
Sunday until Tuesday, and they never went off duty at anytime from
Sunday night, from the time they went on, until about Wednesday, I
guess.
Q. Where did the mayor spend the day--Sunday?
A. Along Liberty street, part of the day.
By Senator Reyburn:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account