Report of the Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877: Read in the Senate and House of Representatives May 23, 1878Pennsylvania. General Assembly. Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877
History
Report of the Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877: Read in the Senate and House of Representatives May 23, 1878
Pennsylvania. General Assembly. Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877
He said, that was all right. That is all I know, unless some special
question may arise.
Q. How many policemen had been discharged prior to Thursday?
A. One hundred and sixteen.
Q. How long had they been discharged before that?
A. They were discharged, I think, sometime about the latter part of
June, or may be the 1st of July. I am not certain as to the date.
Q. Had you any knowledge of any anticipated outbreak or strike by the
men before it was communicated to you by Mr. Watt?
A. Not the slightest. And at that time we had no idea there was going
to be any such trouble at all, as we have had sometimes in this city.
Q. You were present when Mr. Watt asked the mayor to furnish him with
the police?
A. I was in the office.
Q. You heard the mayor's reply?
A. He went out with Mr. Watt and instructed the chief of police to get
the men.
Q. Did Mr. Watt have to promise to pay the men before the mayor gave
that instruction?
A. I believe something was said about pay. These men, you see, were not
on the pay-rolls of the city. The regular men were in bed or scattered
all over the city. These men happened to be there that day, being paid
off.
Q. Did the mayor require Mr. Watt to become responsible for their pay?
A. I believe something was said about the railroad company--that it
would have to pay the men, as no provision was made by the city for
their pay. I think very few of these men were on the regular force.
Q. Did the mayor make that a condition before he instructed you to send
out for the men?
A. He never instructed me to send out for anybody.
Q. Who did he instruct?
A. Either the chief of detectives or the chief of police--I cannot
remember which.
Q. Did he make any order at that time, calling out policemen?
A. Not as I know of.
Q. These men went out as volunteers?
A. Yes; in that sense. They were men who had been discharged. They went
out under the control of Officer Charles McGovern.
Q. They volunteered to go?
A. We had no right to make a demand on them as a police force. They
were not in the employ of the city.
Q. When the telegram came to you calling for fifty policemen, what
effort did you make to get them?
A. We hunted them up as well as we could. A great many of these men
wouldn't go because they were incensed at the city for discharging
them, but a number of them did respond.
Q. You hunted up as many as you could get to go willingly?
A. Yes.
Q. How many?
A. About thirty-five. It not being my special business, I didn't pay
much attention to it.
Q. Did you notify the mayor of that call for fifty additional police?
A. Yes; he sent us out, and says, go hunt them up.
Q. How many did you get?
A. I think about thirty-five. I never burdened my mind specially with
that.
Q. Did you get another call from the railroad company?
A. I have no recollection of another call, except when Mr. Watt came
and said he wanted from fifty to one hundred men additional.
Q. Did you communicate that to the mayor?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account